[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 01/12] ubd: untagle discard vs write zeroes not support handling
On 5/29/24 14:04, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Discard and Write Zeroes are different operation and implemented > by different fallocate opcodes for ubd. If one fails the other one > can work and vice versa. > > Split the code to disable the operations in ubd_handler to only > disable the operation that actually failed. > > Fixes: 50109b5a03b4 ("um: Add support for DISCARD in the UBD Driver") > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > --- > arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c | 11 ++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c > index ef805eaa9e013d..a79a3b7c33a647 100644 > --- a/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c > +++ b/arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c > @@ -471,9 +471,14 @@ static void ubd_handler(void) > for (count = 0; count < n/sizeof(struct io_thread_req *); > count++) { > struct io_thread_req *io_req = (*irq_req_buffer)[count]; > > - if ((io_req->error == BLK_STS_NOTSUPP) && > (req_op(io_req->req) == REQ_OP_DISCARD)) { > - blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(io_req->req->q, > 0); > - > blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(io_req->req->q, 0); > + if (io_req->error == BLK_STS_NOTSUPP) { > + struct request_queue *q = io_req->req->q; > + > + if (req_op(io_req->req) == REQ_OP_DISCARD) > + blk_queue_max_discard_sectors(q, 0); > + if (req_op(io_req->req) == REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES) Nit: this can be an "else if". Otherwise, looks OK to me. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@xxxxxxxxxx> > + blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors(q, > + 0); > } > blk_mq_end_request(io_req->req, io_req->error); > kfree(io_req); -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |