[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v16 4/5] xen/arm: translate virtual PCI bus topology for guests



Hi,

Sorry I didn't notice there was a v16 and posted comments on the v15. The only one is about the size of the list we iterate.

On 23/05/2024 08:48, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 06:59:23PM -0400, Stewart Hildebrand wrote:
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx>

There are three  originators for the PCI configuration space access:
1. The domain that owns physical host bridge: MMIO handlers are
there so we can update vPCI register handlers with the values
written by the hardware domain, e.g. physical view of the registers
vs guest's view on the configuration space.
2. Guest access to the passed through PCI devices: we need to properly
map virtual bus topology to the physical one, e.g. pass the configuration
space access to the corresponding physical devices.
3. Emulated host PCI bridge access. It doesn't exist in the physical
topology, e.g. it can't be mapped to some physical host bridge.
So, all access to the host bridge itself needs to be trapped and
emulated.

Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babchuk@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Stewart Hildebrand <stewart.hildebrand@xxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>

For Arm:

Acked-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@xxxxxxxxxx>


One unrelated question below.

---
In v15:
- base on top of ("arm/vpci: honor access size when returning an error")
In v11:
- Fixed format issues
- Added ASSERT_UNREACHABLE() to the dummy implementation of
vpci_translate_virtual_device()
- Moved variable in vpci_sbdf_from_gpa(), now it is easier to follow
the logic in the function
Since v9:
- Commend about required lock replaced with ASSERT()
- Style fixes
- call to vpci_translate_virtual_device folded into vpci_sbdf_from_gpa
Since v8:
- locks moved out of vpci_translate_virtual_device()
Since v6:
- add pcidevs locking to vpci_translate_virtual_device
- update wrt to the new locking scheme
Since v5:
- add vpci_translate_virtual_device for #ifndef CONFIG_HAS_VPCI_GUEST_SUPPORT
   case to simplify ifdefery
- add ASSERT(!is_hardware_domain(d)); to vpci_translate_virtual_device
- reset output register on failed virtual SBDF translation
Since v4:
- indentation fixes
- constify struct domain
- updated commit message
- updates to the new locking scheme (pdev->vpci_lock)
Since v3:
- revisit locking
- move code to vpci.c
Since v2:
  - pass struct domain instead of struct vcpu
  - constify arguments where possible
  - gate relevant code with CONFIG_HAS_VPCI_GUEST_SUPPORT
New in v2
---
  xen/arch/arm/vpci.c     | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
  xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++
  xen/include/xen/vpci.h  | 12 +++++++++++
  3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
index b63a356bb4a8..516933bebfb3 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/vpci.c
@@ -7,33 +7,53 @@
#include <asm/mmio.h> -static pci_sbdf_t vpci_sbdf_from_gpa(const struct pci_host_bridge *bridge,
-                                     paddr_t gpa)
+static bool vpci_sbdf_from_gpa(struct domain *d,
+                               const struct pci_host_bridge *bridge,
+                               paddr_t gpa, pci_sbdf_t *sbdf)
  {
-    pci_sbdf_t sbdf;
+    bool translated = true;
+
+    ASSERT(sbdf);
if ( bridge )
      {
-        sbdf.sbdf = VPCI_ECAM_BDF(gpa - bridge->cfg->phys_addr);
-        sbdf.seg = bridge->segment;
-        sbdf.bus += bridge->cfg->busn_start;
+        sbdf->sbdf = VPCI_ECAM_BDF(gpa - bridge->cfg->phys_addr);
+        sbdf->seg = bridge->segment;
+        sbdf->bus += bridge->cfg->busn_start;
      }
      else
-        sbdf.sbdf = VPCI_ECAM_BDF(gpa - GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_BASE);
+    {
+        /*
+         * For the passed through devices we need to map their virtual SBDF
+         * to the physical PCI device being passed through.
+         */
+        sbdf->sbdf = VPCI_ECAM_BDF(gpa - GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_BASE);
+        read_lock(&d->pci_lock);
+        translated = vpci_translate_virtual_device(d, sbdf);
+        read_unlock(&d->pci_lock);

I would consider moving the read_{,un}lock() calls inside
vpci_translate_virtual_device(), if that's the only caller of
vpci_translate_virtual_device().  Maybe further patches add other
instances that call from an already locked context.

+    }
- return sbdf;
+    return translated;
  }
static int vpci_mmio_read(struct vcpu *v, mmio_info_t *info,
                            register_t *r, void *p)
  {
      struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = p;
-    pci_sbdf_t sbdf = vpci_sbdf_from_gpa(bridge, info->gpa);
+    pci_sbdf_t sbdf;
      const unsigned int access_size = (1U << info->dabt.size) * 8;
      const register_t invalid = GENMASK_ULL(access_size - 1, 0);

Do you know why the invalid value is truncated to the access size.

Because no other callers are doing the truncation and therefore the guest would read 1s even for 8-byte unsigned access.

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.