[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH] drivers/xen: Improve the late XenStore init protocol
On Thu, 16 May 2024, Henry Wang wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > On 5/16/2024 6:30 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Wed, 15 May 2024, Henry Wang wrote: > > > Currently, the late XenStore init protocol is only triggered properly > > > for the case that HVM_PARAM_STORE_PFN is ~0ULL (invalid). For the > > > case that XenStore interface is allocated but not ready (the connection > > > status is not XENSTORE_CONNECTED), Linux should also wait until the > > > XenStore is set up properly. > > > > > > Introduce a macro to describe the XenStore interface is ready, use > > > it in xenbus_probe_initcall() and xenbus_probe() to select the code > > > path of doing the late XenStore init protocol or not. > > > > > > Take the opportunity to enhance the check of the allocated XenStore > > > interface can be properly mapped, and return error early if the > > > memremap() fails. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Henry Wang <xin.wang2@xxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx> > > Please add a Fixes: tag > > Sure. Will do. > > > > --- > > > drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++----- > > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c > > > b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c > > > index 3205e5d724c8..8aec0ed1d047 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c > > > +++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c > > > @@ -72,6 +72,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_store_evtchn); > > > struct xenstore_domain_interface *xen_store_interface; > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_store_interface); > > > +#define XS_INTERFACE_READY \ > > > + ((xen_store_interface != NULL) && \ > > > + (xen_store_interface->connection == XENSTORE_CONNECTED)) > > > + > > > enum xenstore_init xen_store_domain_type; > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_store_domain_type); > > > @@ -751,9 +755,10 @@ static void xenbus_probe(void) > > > { > > > xenstored_ready = 1; > > > - if (!xen_store_interface) { > > > - xen_store_interface = memremap(xen_store_gfn << > > > XEN_PAGE_SHIFT, > > > - XEN_PAGE_SIZE, MEMREMAP_WB); > > > + if (!xen_store_interface || XS_INTERFACE_READY) { > > > + if (!xen_store_interface) > > These two nested if's don't make sense to me. If XS_INTERFACE_READY > > succeeds, it means that ((xen_store_interface != NULL) && > > (xen_store_interface->connection == XENSTORE_CONNECTED)). > > > > So it is not possible that xen_store_interface == NULL immediately > > after. Right? > > I think this is because we want to free the irq for the late init case, > otherwise the init-dom0less will fail. For the xenstore PFN allocated case, > the connection is already set to CONNECTED when we execute init-dom0less. But > I agree with you, would below diff makes more sense to you? > > diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c > b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c > index 8aec0ed1d047..b8005b651a29 100644 > --- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c > +++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c > @@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_store_interface); > ((xen_store_interface != NULL) && \ > (xen_store_interface->connection == XENSTORE_CONNECTED)) > > +static bool xs_late_init = false; > + > enum xenstore_init xen_store_domain_type; > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_store_domain_type); > > @@ -755,7 +757,7 @@ static void xenbus_probe(void) > { > xenstored_ready = 1; > > - if (!xen_store_interface || XS_INTERFACE_READY) { > + if (xs_late_init) { > if (!xen_store_interface) > xen_store_interface = memremap(xen_store_gfn << I would just remove the outer 'if' and do this: if (!xen_store_interface) xen_store_interface = memremap(xen_store_gfn << XEN_PAGE_SHIFT, XEN_PAGE_SIZE, MEMREMAP_WB); /* * Now it is safe to free the IRQ used for xenstore late * initialization. No need to unbind: it is about to be * bound again from xb_init_comms. Note that calling * unbind_from_irqhandler now would result in xen_evtchn_close() * being called and the event channel not being enabled again * afterwards, resulting in missed event notifications. */ if (xs_init_irq > 0) free_irq(xs_init_irq, &xb_waitq); I think this should work fine in all cases. I am unsure if xs_init_irq==0 is possible valid value for xs_init_irq. If it is not, then we are fine. If 0 is a possible valid irq number, then we should initialize xs_init_irq to -1, and here check for xs_init_irq >= 0.
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |