[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH for-4.19] tools/xentop: fix cpu% sort order
On Tue, 2024-05-14 at 14:52 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 14/05/2024 1:36 pm, Leigh Brown wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On 2024-05-14 13:07, Andrew Cooper wrote: > > > On 14/05/2024 9:13 am, Leigh Brown wrote: > > > > Although using integer comparison to compare doubles kind of > > > > works, it's annoying to see domains slightly out of order when > > > > sorting by cpu%. > > > > > > > > Add a compare_dbl() function and update compare_cpu_pct() to > > > > call it. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Leigh Brown <leigh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > tools/xentop/xentop.c | 13 ++++++++++++- > > > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/tools/xentop/xentop.c b/tools/xentop/xentop.c > > > > index 545bd5e96d..99199caec9 100644 > > > > --- a/tools/xentop/xentop.c > > > > +++ b/tools/xentop/xentop.c > > > > @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ static void set_delay(const char *value); > > > > static void set_prompt(const char *new_prompt, void > > > > (*func)(const > > > > char *)); > > > > static int handle_key(int); > > > > static int compare(unsigned long long, unsigned long long); > > > > +static int compare_dbl(double, double); > > > > static int compare_domains(xenstat_domain **, xenstat_domain > > > > **); > > > > static unsigned long long tot_net_bytes( xenstat_domain *, > > > > int); > > > > static bool tot_vbd_reqs(xenstat_domain *, int, unsigned long > > > > long *); > > > > @@ -422,6 +423,16 @@ static int compare(unsigned long long i1, > > > > unsigned long long i2) > > > > return 0; > > > > } > > > > > > > > +/* Compares two double precision numbers, returning -1,0,1 for > > > > <,=,> */ > > > > +static int compare_dbl(double d1, double d2) > > > > +{ > > > > + if(d1 < d2) > > > > + return -1; > > > > + if(d1 > d2) > > > > + return 1; > > > > + return 0; > > > > +} > > > > + > > > > /* Comparison function for use with qsort. Compares two > > > > domains > > > > using the > > > > * current sort field. */ > > > > static int compare_domains(xenstat_domain **domain1, > > > > xenstat_domain > > > > **domain2) > > > > @@ -523,7 +534,7 @@ static double get_cpu_pct(xenstat_domain > > > > *domain) > > > > > > > > static int compare_cpu_pct(xenstat_domain *domain1, > > > > xenstat_domain > > > > *domain2) > > > > { > > > > - return -compare(get_cpu_pct(domain1), > > > > get_cpu_pct(domain2)); > > > > + return -compare_dbl(get_cpu_pct(domain1), > > > > get_cpu_pct(domain2)); > > > > > > Oh, we were doing an implicit double->unsigned long long > > > conversion. > > > Over the range 0.0 to 100.0, that ought to work as expected. > > > What kind > > > of out-of-order are you seeing? > > > > Without patch: > > > > xentop - 13:29:01 Xen 4.18.2 > > 13 domains: 1 running, 12 blocked, 0 paused, 0 crashed, 0 dying, 0 > > shutdown > > Mem: 67030640k total, 33097800k used, 33932840k free CPUs: 24 @ > > 3693MHz > > NAME STATE CPU(sec) CPU(%) MEM(k) MEM(%) MAXMEM(k) > > MAXMEM(%) > > icecream --b--- 2597 6.6 4194368 6.3 > > 4195328 6.3 > > xendd --b--- 4016 5.4 524268 0.8 > > 525312 0.8 > > Domain-0 -----r 1059 1.7 1048576 1.6 > > 1048576 1.6 > > neon --b--- 826 1.1 2097216 3.1 > > 2098176 3.1 > > blender --b--- 121 0.2 1048640 1.6 > > 1049600 1.6 > > bread --b--- 69 0.1 524352 0.8 > > 525312 0.8 > > bob --b--- 502 0.3 16777284 25.0 > > 16778240 25.0 > > cheese --b--- 225 0.5 1048384 1.6 > > 1049600 1.6 > > cassini --b--- 489 0.4 3145792 4.7 > > 3146752 4.7 > > chickpea --b--- 67 0.1 524352 0.8 > > 525312 0.8 > > lentil --b--- 67 0.1 262208 0.4 > > 263168 0.4 > > fusilli --b--- 159 0.2 524352 0.8 > > 525312 0.8 > > pizza --b--- 359 0.5 524352 0.8 > > 525312 0.8 > > > > With patch: > > > > xentop - 13:30:17 Xen 4.18.2 > > 13 domains: 1 running, 12 blocked, 0 paused, 0 crashed, 0 dying, 0 > > shutdown > > Mem: 67030640k total, 33097788k used, 33932852k free CPUs: 24 @ > > 3693MHz > > NAME STATE CPU(sec) CPU(%) MEM(k) MEM(%) MAXMEM(k) > > MAXMEM(%) > > xendd --b--- 4020 5.7 524268 0.8 > > 525312 0.8 > > icecream --b--- 2600 3.8 4194368 6.3 > > 4195328 6.3 > > Domain-0 -----r 1060 1.5 1048576 1.6 > > 1048576 1.6 > > neon --b--- 827 1.1 2097216 3.1 > > 2098176 3.1 > > cheese --b--- 225 0.7 1048384 1.6 > > 1049600 1.6 > > pizza --b--- 359 0.5 524352 0.8 > > 525312 0.8 > > cassini --b--- 490 0.4 3145792 4.7 > > 3146752 4.7 > > fusilli --b--- 159 0.2 524352 0.8 > > 525312 0.8 > > bob --b--- 502 0.2 16777284 25.0 > > 16778240 25.0 > > blender --b--- 121 0.2 1048640 1.6 > > 1049600 1.6 > > bread --b--- 69 0.1 524352 0.8 > > 525312 0.8 > > chickpea --b--- 67 0.1 524352 0.8 > > 525312 0.8 > > lentil --b--- 67 0.1 262208 0.4 > > 263168 0.4 > > > Ah, so it's the rounding, and a straight cast discards the fractional > part. > > I think your patch is fine, although it could do with a mention of > why > this goes wrong in the commit message. I'm happy to adjust on > commit. Feel free to merge it as I am considering it as bugfix: Release-acked-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx> ~ Oleksii > > ~Andrew
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |