[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [PATCH] x86/ucode: Distinguish "ucode already up to date"
Right now, Xen returns -ENOENT for both "the provided blob isn't correct for this CPU", and "the blob isn't newer than what's loaded". This in turn causes xen-ucode to exit with an error, when "nothing to do" is more commonly a success condition. Handle EEXIST specially and exit cleanly. Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> --- CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> --- tools/misc/xen-ucode.c | 5 ++++- xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/misc/xen-ucode.c b/tools/misc/xen-ucode.c index c6ae6498d659..390969db3d1c 100644 --- a/tools/misc/xen-ucode.c +++ b/tools/misc/xen-ucode.c @@ -125,8 +125,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) exit(1); } + errno = 0; ret = xc_microcode_update(xch, buf, len); - if ( ret ) + if ( ret == -1 && errno == EEXIST ) + printf("Microcode already up to date\n"); + else if ( ret ) { fprintf(stderr, "Failed to update microcode. (err: %s)\n", strerror(errno)); diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c index e738a88f5cd1..762111838f5f 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ static long cf_check microcode_update_helper(void *data) "microcode: couldn't find any newer%s revision in the provided blob!\n", opt_ucode_allow_same ? " (or the same)" : ""); microcode_free_patch(patch); - ret = -ENOENT; + ret = -EEXIST; goto put; } base-commit: a2330b51df267e20e66bbba6c5bf08f0570ed58b -- 2.30.2
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |