|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] IOMMU: rename and re-type ats_enabled
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 11:15:39AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Make the variable a tristate, with (as done elsewhere) a negative value
> meaning "default". Since all use sites need looking at, also rename it
> to match our usual "opt_*" pattern. While touching it, also move it to
> .data.ro_after_init.
I guess I need to look at further patches, as given the feedback on
the past version I think we agreed we want to set ATS unconditionally
disabled by default, and hence I'm not sure I see the point of the
tri-state if enabling ATS will require an explicit opt-in on the
command line (ats=1).
> The only place it retains boolean nature is pci_ats_device(), for now.
>
> In AMD code re-order conditionals to have the config space accesses
> after (cheaper) flag checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> In domain_context_mapping_one() I'm a little puzzled that translation
> type is selected based on only IOMMU and global properties, i.e. not
> taking the device itself into account.
Is it maybe fine do set DEV_IOTLB unconditionally as long as the IOMMU
supports it, and then let the device decide whether it wants to issue
translated or non-translated requests depending on whether it supports
(and enables) ATS?
I think it would be best to limit this strictly to devices that have
ATS enabled.
> ---
> v2: Re-base over new earlier patches.
>
> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_cmd.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_cmd.c
> @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ void amd_iommu_flush_iotlb(u8 devfn, con
> struct amd_iommu *iommu;
> unsigned int req_id, queueid, maxpend;
>
> - if ( !ats_enabled )
> + if ( opt_ats <= 0 )
If having a tri-state is required, won't it be best to decide on a
binary value at init time, so that runtime functions can handle
opt_ats as a boolean?
Otherwise we are open coding the default expectation of what -1
implies (disabled) in all use sites.
> return;
>
> if ( !pci_ats_enabled(pdev->seg, pdev->bus, pdev->devfn) )
> @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ static void _amd_iommu_flush_pages(struc
> flush_command_buffer(iommu, 0);
> }
>
> - if ( ats_enabled )
> + if ( opt_ats > 0 )
> {
> amd_iommu_flush_all_iotlbs(d, daddr, order);
>
> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/pci_amd_iommu.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/pci_amd_iommu.c
> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static bool use_ats(
> const struct amd_iommu *iommu,
> const struct ivrs_mappings *ivrs_dev)
> {
> - return !ivrs_dev->block_ats &&
> + return opt_ats > 0 && !ivrs_dev->block_ats &&
> iommu_has_cap(iommu, PCI_CAP_IOTLB_SHIFT) &&
> pci_ats_device(iommu->seg, pdev->bus, pdev->devfn);
> }
> @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static int __must_check amd_iommu_setup_
> dte->sys_mgt = MASK_EXTR(ivrs_dev->device_flags,
> ACPI_IVHD_SYSTEM_MGMT);
>
> if ( use_ats(pdev, iommu, ivrs_dev) )
> - dte->i = ats_enabled;
> + dte->i = true;
Might be easier to just use:
dte->i = use_ats(pdev, iommu, ivrs_dev);
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iommu->lock, flags);
>
> @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static int __must_check amd_iommu_setup_
> ACPI_IVHD_SYSTEM_MGMT));
>
> if ( use_ats(pdev, iommu, ivrs_dev) )
> - ASSERT(dte->i == ats_enabled);
> + ASSERT(dte->i);
ASSERT(dte->i == use_ats(pdev, iommu, ivrs_dev));
>
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iommu->lock, flags);
>
> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/ats.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/ats.c
> @@ -18,8 +18,8 @@
> #include <xen/pci_regs.h>
> #include "ats.h"
>
> -bool __read_mostly ats_enabled;
> -boolean_param("ats", ats_enabled);
> +int8_t __ro_after_init opt_ats = -1;
> +boolean_param("ats", opt_ats);
>
> int enable_ats_device(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct list_head *ats_list)
> {
> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/ats.h
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/ats.h
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
> #define ATS_QUEUE_DEPTH_MASK 0x1f
> #define ATS_ENABLE (1<<15)
>
> -extern bool ats_enabled;
> +extern int8_t opt_ats;
>
> int enable_ats_device(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct list_head *ats_list);
> void disable_ats_device(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static inline int pci_ats_enabled(int se
>
> static inline int pci_ats_device(int seg, int bus, int devfn)
> {
> - if ( !ats_enabled )
> + if ( !opt_ats )
> return 0;
Can't you remove that check altogether now, since you are adding an
opt_ats check to use_ats()?
Thanks, Roger.
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |