Re: [XEN PATCH] automation/eclair: add deviations for MISRA C:2012 Rule 16.4

[Federico Serafini <federico.serafini@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 23/04/24 18:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 23.04.2024 17:52, Federico Serafini wrote:
> > On 23/04/24 12:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > On 23.04.2024 12:02, Federico Serafini wrote:
> > > > +
> > > > +   * - R16.4
> > > > +     - A switch statement with a single switch clause and no default label may
> > > > +       be used in place of an equivalent if statement if it is considered to
> > > > +       improve readability."
> No, I don't think there should be examples in those documents. But those
> documents should also not (blindly) rely on terminology in the Misra
> spec, as not everyone has access to that (licensed copies had to be
> obtained for quite a few of us).
In deviations.rst there is an identical deviation for Rule 16.6
("Every switch statement shall have at least two switch-clauses").
I think we should remain consistent.

--
Federico Serafini, M.Sc.

Software Engineer, BUGSENG (http://bugseng.com)