[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [XEN PATCH] automaton/eclair: add deviations for MISRA C:2012 Rule 13.6


  • To: Federico Serafini <federico.serafini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 16:34:48 +0200
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: consulting@xxxxxxxxxxx, Simone Ballarin <simone.ballarin@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Doug Goldstein <cardoe@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 14:34:59 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 04.04.2024 16:21, Federico Serafini wrote:
> --- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
> +++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
> @@ -333,6 +333,14 @@ of the short-circuit evaluation strategy of such logical 
> operators."
>  -config=MC3R1.R13.5,reports+={disapplied,"any()"}
>  -doc_end
>  
> +-doc_begin="Macros alternative_vcall[0-9] use sizeof to type-check \"func\" 
> and the func parameters without evaluating them."
> +-config=MC3R1.R13.6,reports+={deliberate,"any_area(any_loc(any_exp(macro(^alternative_vcall[0-9]$))))"}
> +-doc_end

alternative_vcall(), for now at least, is x86-only. Why blindly deviate it also
for Arm?

> +-doc_begin="Macro chk_fld is only used to introduce BUILD_BUG_ON checks in 
> very specific cases where by code inspection you can see that its usage is 
> correct. The BUILD_BUG_ON checks check that EFI_TIME and struct 
> xenpf_efi_time fields match."
> +-config=MC3R1.R13.6,reports+={deliberate,"any_area(any_loc(any_exp(macro(^chk_fld$))))"}
> +-doc_end

As indicated on earlier occasions - when a macro isn't global, its deviation
better wouldn't be global either. An identically named macro may be introduced
elsewhere, and may not need deviating there.

> --- a/docs/misra/deviations.rst
> +++ b/docs/misra/deviations.rst
> @@ -279,6 +279,18 @@ Deviations related to MISRA C:2012 Rules:
>         the short-circuit evaluation strategy for logical operators.
>       - Project-wide deviation; tagged as `disapplied` for ECLAIR.
>  
> +   * - R13.6
> +     - Macros alternative_vcall[0-9] use sizeof to type-check \"func\" and 
> the
> +       func parameters without evaluating them.

Just to mention it: The return type of the function isn't really of interest
there. What's being checked is that the argument types match the corresponding
parameter ones, which otherwise would "naturally" be done by the compiler when
seeing function calls. Might be useful to state no more and no less than what
is really needed.

Further, according to the discussion on the matter: alternative_call() is
quite similar in this regard, just that it uses typeof(). Imo it should be
deviated here as well right away, no matter whether Eclair can actually be
configured to also check typeof() and alignof().

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.