[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] xen/device-tree: Move Arm's setup.c bootinfo functions to common
- To: Shawn Anastasio <sanastasio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:42:07 +0100
- Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
- Cc: tpearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>, "Daniel P. Smith" <dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 07:42:14 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 20.03.2024 19:07, Shawn Anastasio wrote:
> On 3/15/24 4:16 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 14.03.2024 23:15, Shawn Anastasio wrote:
>>> Arm's setup.c contains a collection of functions for parsing memory map
>>> and other boot information from a device tree. Since these routines are
>>> generally useful on any architecture that supports device tree booting,
>>> move them into xen/common/device-tree.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shawn Anastasio <sanastasio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
>>> xen/arch/arm/setup.c | 419 --------------------------
>>> xen/common/Makefile | 1 +
>>> xen/common/device-tree/Makefile | 1 +
>>> xen/common/device-tree/bootinfo.c | 469 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 5 files changed, 472 insertions(+), 419 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644 xen/common/device-tree/Makefile
>>> create mode 100644 xen/common/device-tree/bootinfo.c
>>>
>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>>> index 56a6932037..e85fbe6737 100644
>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>>> @@ -301,6 +301,7 @@ M: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> M: Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>
>>> S: Supported
>>> F: xen/common/libfdt/
>>> +F: xen/common/device-tree/setup.c
>>
>> Perhaps more generally
>>
>> F: xen/common/device-tree/
>>
>> ?
>>
>
> This was done to allow bootfdt.c (next patch) to remain under ARM's
> maintainership, which I believe was your suggestion in v2.
>
> Perhaps it would make sense to leave both setup.c and bootfdt.c under
> ARM's maintainership, or would it be acceptable to move both to device
> tree?
What exactly is wanted needs to be sorted by the maintainers (Arm / DT).
To me, having everything DT under DT maintainership (which is a subset
of Arm maintainers anyway) would make most sense.
Jan
|