[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [XEN PATCH] xen/compiler: deviate the inline macro for MISRA C Rule 20.4
On 08.03.2024 09:10, Nicola Vetrini wrote: > Rule 20.4 states: "A macro shall not be defined with the same name > as a keyword". > > Defining this macro with the same name as the inline keyword > allows for additionally checking that out-of-lined static inline > functions end up in the correct section while minimizing churn and > has a positive impact on the overall safety. See [1] for additional > context on the motivation of this deviation. > > No functional change. > > [1] > https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/adaa6d55-266d-4df8-8967-9340080d17e4@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > docs/misra/safe.json | 8 ++++++++ > xen/include/xen/compiler.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/docs/misra/safe.json b/docs/misra/safe.json > index 952324f85cf9..a2bbacddf06a 100644 > --- a/docs/misra/safe.json > +++ b/docs/misra/safe.json > @@ -28,6 +28,14 @@ > }, > { > "id": "SAF-3-safe", > + "analyser": { > + "eclair": "MC3R1.R20.4" > + }, > + "name": "MC3R1.R20.4: allow the augmentation of the inline > keyword in some build configurations", > + "text": "The definition of this macro named inline allows > further checking in some build configurations that certain symbols end up in > the right sections." > + }, With this wording the ID isn't going to be re-usable anywhere else. Even if the exact same reasoning would apply. > + { > + "id": "SAF-4-safe", > "analyser": {}, > "name": "Sentinel", > "text": "Next ID to be used" > diff --git a/xen/include/xen/compiler.h b/xen/include/xen/compiler.h > index 16d554f2a593..e3d9f9fb8e4b 100644 > --- a/xen/include/xen/compiler.h > +++ b/xen/include/xen/compiler.h > @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ > * inline functions not expanded inline get placed in .init.text. > */ > #include <xen/init.h> > +/* SAF-3-safe MISRA C Rule 20.4: define the inline macro to perform checks */ > #define inline inline __init > #endif I don't think the definition is "to perform checks"; it's rather to make sure checking elsewhere wouldn't (seemingly) randomly fail. 'Override "inline" for section contents checks to pass when the compiler chooses not to inline a particular function' perhaps? Albeit that's getting long-ish, I fear. Jan
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |