[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v3 15/34] xen/riscv: introduce atomic.h
On 22.12.2023 16:12, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > --- /dev/null > +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/atomic.h > @@ -0,0 +1,384 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ > +/* > + * Taken and modified from Linux. > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2007 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved. > + * Copyright (C) 2012 Regents of the University of California > + * Copyright (C) 2017 SiFive > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Vates SAS > + */ > + > +#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_ATOMIC_H > +#define _ASM_RISCV_ATOMIC_H > + > +#include <xen/atomic.h> > +#include <asm/cmpxchg.h> > +#include <asm/fence.h> > +#include <asm/io.h> > +#include <asm/system.h> > + > +void __bad_atomic_size(void); > + > +static always_inline void read_atomic_size(const volatile void *p, > + void *res, > + unsigned int size) > +{ > + switch ( size ) > + { > + case 1: *(uint8_t *)res = readb((const uint8_t *)p); break; > + case 2: *(uint16_t *)res = readw((const uint16_t *)p); break; > + case 4: *(uint32_t *)res = readl((const uint32_t *)p); break; > + case 8: *(uint32_t *)res = readq((const uint64_t *)p); break; Just like const, you should also avoid casting away volatile. > + default: __bad_atomic_size(); break; > + } > +} > + > +#define read_atomic(p) ({ \ > + union { typeof(*p) val; char c[0]; } x_; \ > + read_atomic_size(p, x_.c, sizeof(*p)); \ > + x_.val; \ > +}) > + > + Nit: No double blank lines please. > +#define write_atomic(p, x) ({ \ > + typeof(*p) x__ = (x); \ > + switch ( sizeof(*p) ) > \ > + { > \ These lines look excessively long, possibly as a result of leaving hard tabs in place. Overall some of the style comments on the earlier patch seem to apply here as well. > --- /dev/null > +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/include/asm/fence.h > @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ > +#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_FENCE_H > +#define _ASM_RISCV_FENCE_H > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP > +#define RISCV_ACQUIRE_BARRIER "\tfence r , rw\n" > +#define RISCV_RELEASE_BARRIER "\tfence rw, w\n" > +#else > +#define RISCV_ACQUIRE_BARRIER > +#define RISCV_RELEASE_BARRIER > +#endif Do you really care about the !SMP case? On x86 at least we stopped special- casing that configuration many years ago (the few cases where for typically build reasons it matters, using CONFIG_NR_CPUS is sufficient). If you care about it, there needs to be somewhere you actually #define CONFIG_SMP. Jan
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |