Re: [XEN PATCH v2 7/7] automation/eclair_analysis: avoid violation of MISRA Rule 2.1

[Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 18 Dec 2023, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2023, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> > The presence of an unlinked object file triggers a violation
> > of MISRA C Rule 2.1, which is deviated, as it's not part of
> > the final Xen binary.
> > 
> > No functional change.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Acked-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> > ---
> >  automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl | 5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl 
> > b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
> > index 85741a2c01a9..e3de0fb2adf8 100644
> > --- a/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
> > +++ b/automation/eclair_analysis/ECLAIR/deviations.ecl
> > @@ -28,6 +28,11 @@ not executable, and therefore it is safe for them to be 
> > unreachable."
> >  -config=MC3R1.R2.1,ignored_stmts+={"any()", "pure_decl()"}
> >  -doc_end
> >  
> > ++-doc_begin="The following autogenerated file is not linked deliberately."
> > ++-file_tag+={C_runtime_failures,"^automation/eclair_analysis/C-runtime-failures\\.rst\\.c$"}
> > ++-config=MC3R1.R2.1,reports+={deliberate, 
> > "any_area(any_loc(file(C_runtime_failures)))"}
> > ++-doc_end

Would it make sense to add it to exclude-list instead?