Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] x86/iommu: remove regions not to be mapped

[Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 04:11:21PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 04.12.2023 10:43, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
> > @@ -2136,6 +2136,54 @@ int __hwdom_init xen_in_range(unsigned long mfn)
> >      return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +int __hwdom_init remove_xen_ranges(struct rangeset *r)
> > +{
> > +    paddr_t start, end;
> > +    int rc;
> > +
> > +    /* S3 resume code (and other real mode trampoline code) */
> > +    rc = rangeset_remove_range(r, PFN_DOWN(bootsym_phys(trampoline_start)),
> > +                               PFN_DOWN(bootsym_phys(trampoline_end)));
> > +    if ( rc )
> > +        return rc;
> > +
> > +    /*
> > +     * This needs to remain in sync with the uses of the same symbols in
> > +     * - __start_xen()
> > +     * - is_xen_fixed_mfn()
> > +     * - tboot_shutdown()
> > +     */
> 
> As you're duplicating this comment from xen_in_range(), you want to
> - also mention xen_in_range() here,
> - also update xen_in_range()'s comment,

xen_in_range() is going away in the last patch, hence I did bother tyo
update it.

> - also update the respective comments in __start_xen() that also mention
>   xen_in_range().

That's done in patch 6/6.

> Everything else here looks good to me.

Let me know if doing such changes in a later patch is OK.

Thanks, Roger.