[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v3] xen: address violations of MISRA C:2012 Rule 11.8.
On 04/12/23 17:54, Jan Beulich wrote: On 04.12.2023 17:32, Simone Ballarin wrote:From: Maria Celeste Cesario <maria.celeste.cesario@xxxxxxxxxxx> Remove or amend casts to comply with Rule 11.8. Fix violations by adding missing const qualifier in cast. Fix violations by removing unnecessary cast. Change type of operands from char* to uintptr_t: uintptr_t is the appropriate type for memory address operations. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Maria Celeste Cesario <maria.celeste.cesario@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Simone Ballarin <simone.ballarin@xxxxxxxxxxx>I consider it good practice to at least briefly say what the rule is about, so it is clear why certain changes need doing.--- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h +++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/atomic.h @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static always_inline void write_atomic_size(volatile void *p, */ static inline int atomic_read(const atomic_t *v) { - return *(volatile int *)&v->counter; + return *(const volatile int *)&v->counter; }What about PPC's identical code? If the ARM part is accepted, I will include this change in an upcoming series for Rule 11.8 (which I'm working on), otherwise in v4. --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/regs.h +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/regs.h @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@#define guest_mode(r) \({ \ - unsigned long diff = (char *)guest_cpu_user_regs() - (char *)(r); \ + unsigned long diff = (uintptr_t)guest_cpu_user_regs() - (uintptr_t)(r); \ /* Frame pointer must point into current CPU stack. */ \ ASSERT(diff < STACK_SIZE); \ /* If not a guest frame, it must be a hypervisor frame. */ \This part Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Jan -- Simone Ballarin, M.Sc. Field Application Engineer, BUGSENG (https://bugseng.com)
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |