|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH] sched: correct sched_move_domain()'s cleanup path
On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 10:57 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> It is only in the error case that we want to clean up the new pool's
> scheduler data; in the success case it's rather the old scheduler's
> data which needs cleaning up.
>
> Reported-by: René Winther Højgaard <renewin@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
>
> --- a/xen/common/sched/core.c
> +++ b/xen/common/sched/core.c
> @@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ int sched_move_domain(struct domain *d,
> for ( unit = old_units; unit; )
> {
> if ( unit->priv )
> - sched_free_udata(c->sched, unit->priv);
> + sched_free_udata(ret ? c->sched : old_ops, unit->priv);
> old_unit = unit;
> unit = unit->next_in_list;
> xfree(old_unit);
This code is unfortunately written in a "clever" way which seems to
have introduced some confusion. The one place which calls "goto
out_free" goes through and replaces *most* of the "old_*" variables
with the "new" equivalents. That's why we're iterating over
`old_units` even on the failure path.
The result is that this change doesn't catch another bug on the
following line, in the error case:
sched_free_domdata(old_ops, old_domdata);
At this point, old_ops is still the old ops, but old_domdata is the
*new* domdata.
A patch like the following (compile tested only) would fix it along
the lines of the original intent:
8<-------
diff --git a/xen/common/sched/core.c b/xen/common/sched/core.c
index eba0cea4bb..78f21839d3 100644
--- a/xen/common/sched/core.c
+++ b/xen/common/sched/core.c
@@ -720,6 +720,7 @@ int sched_move_domain(struct domain *d, struct cpupool *c)
{
old_units = new_units;
old_domdata = domdata;
+ old_ops = c->sched;
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out_free;
}
@@ -809,10 +810,15 @@ int sched_move_domain(struct domain *d, struct cpupool *c)
domain_unpause(d);
out_free:
+ /*
+ * NB if we've jumped here, "old_units", "old_ops", and so on will
+ * actually be pointing to the new ops, since when aborting it's
+ * the new ops we want to free.
+ */
for ( unit = old_units; unit; )
{
if ( unit->priv )
- sched_free_udata(c->sched, unit->priv);
+ sched_free_udata(old_ops, unit->priv);
old_unit = unit;
unit = unit->next_in_list;
xfree(old_unit);
---->8
But given that this kind of cleverness has already fooled two of our
most senior developers, I'd suggest making the whole thing more
explicit; something like the attached (again compile-tested only)?
-George
Attachment:
0001-sched-clarify-and-correct-sched_move_domain-s-cleanu.patch
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |