[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [XEN PATCH v2 3/3] xen: address violations of MISRA C:2012 Rule 13.1
- To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 08:46:53 +0100
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=9NdLm1zNuPzec4QETEPw9e1j7zW5giHJkgFB4eaiKAg=; b=bDLpcROjZrfV8uLV+zV2KBkjXizGmm8/E63RumMUpMfLfLEbWnW+he/Qb3XRjuVWHRGiFFg47Vs4NJ/EBFBhHVibMskPVbzGvHWPDotLUA3ShSl2AiaGAMAOHGMcq8jOdak3nNnN0IXvVEBYMLlYipTAOxwuMoRzy1C9U+3sss/UXw7yKs5D8jqfrJesGcKwAJwfcRdI3QBiqWKuD4Ij9Y6ab7YnnmvppzEZm1OiAE1JM9HTu6OSp0MLfzi0T+IkipOyOmoRjfcRJyPsOUz3ojmlFAOCj8JVTRoKhyFpbFM7prItvFFlBik5ynRwFoC1enPaUxtrUPB4keYzUKVLgQ==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=a7zfeR3HMSQnctjH4c3nz/crLHK5w94fiRY9DQU0J0zZ/bwYOcUUpUxbddvMu26eCWN+Hf5Jar2SpUaCDDcQk7Vc6hnzVjX5mbN69XOUiO1tFZoXqLPxn7B31YcTrsL/xorqhsaOXNV/amLEEGNjAs4FM39jO4FFTah3CgOq+NDmxmJG/eYtBGIE7rEat3Bx50yTBEfy0CzvRkZRFY85n15KcjYByk+jjuqjZgtQr5Ab3y0UkZQZBfEd4yUbVba2BRO45gYAFzaCyhE/Bg3FHM8uYjpo8F70tgOV4XSwAtAhPJg94WvQlLnAxMBPctxnHqEtCoAe5leui/x2AOGkRg==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
- Cc: Simone Ballarin <simone.ballarin@xxxxxxxxxxx>, consulting@xxxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Maria Celeste Cesario <maria.celeste.cesario@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Mon, 04 Dec 2023 07:46:59 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 02.12.2023 04:22, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2023, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 24.11.2023 18:29, Simone Ballarin wrote:
>>> Rule 13.1: Initializer lists shall not contain persistent side effects
>>>
>>> The assignment operation in:
>>>
>>> .irq = rc = uart->irq,
>>>
>>> is a persistent side effect in a struct initializer list.
>>>
>>> This patch avoids rc assignment and directly uses uart->irq
>>> in the following if statement.
>>>
>>> No functional changes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Maria Celeste Cesario <maria.celeste.cesario@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Simone Ballarin <simone.ballarin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Who's the author of this patch? (Either the order of the SoB is wrong, or
>> there's a From: tag missing.)
>>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - avoid assignment of rc;
>>> - drop changes in vcpu_yield(void).
>>> ---
>>> xen/drivers/char/ns16550.c | 6 ++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> This warrants a more specific subject prefix. Also there's only a single
>> violation being dealt with here.
>>
>>> --- a/xen/drivers/char/ns16550.c
>>> +++ b/xen/drivers/char/ns16550.c
>>> @@ -445,11 +445,13 @@ static void __init cf_check
>>> ns16550_init_postirq(struct serial_port *port)
>>> struct msi_info msi = {
>>> .sbdf = PCI_SBDF(0, uart->ps_bdf[0], uart->ps_bdf[1],
>>> uart->ps_bdf[2]),
>>> - .irq = rc = uart->irq,
>>> + .irq = uart->irq,
>>> .entry_nr = 1
>>> };
>>>
>>> - if ( rc > 0 )
>>> + rc = 0;
>>> +
>>> + if ( uart->irq > 0 )
>>> {
>>> struct msi_desc *msi_desc = NULL;
>>
>> The fact that there's no functional change here isn't really obvious.
>> Imo you want to prove that to a reasonable degree in the description.
>
> Agreed. Only reading this chunk, wouldn't it be better to do:
>
> };
>
> rc = uart->irq;
>
> if ( rc > 0 )
>
> at least it would be obvious?
Indeed.
Jan
|