Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] xen/x86: introduce self modifying code test

[Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 1 Dec 2023, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > > @@ -1261,6 +1269,7 @@ struct xen_sysctl {
> > >          struct xen_sysctl_livepatch_op      livepatch;
> > >  #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
> > >          struct xen_sysctl_cpu_policy        cpu_policy;
> > > +        struct xen_sysctl_test_smc          smc;
> > 
> > Imo the field name would better be test_smc (leaving aside Stefano's 
> > comment).
> 
> Right, will see what Stefano thinks about using test_smoc.


If you meant "test_smoc", that's totally fine.

If you meant "test_smc" I think that must be a test for the virtual SMC
interface that Xen exposes, right?  Good we need some tests for vsmc.c
;-)