Re: INFORMAL VOTE REQUIRED - DOCUMENTATION WORDING

[George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 9:44 PM Stefano Stabellini
<sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> By the informal
> voting, we have 3 against "broken" and 2 in favor (not 1 as George wrote
> as Andrew's vote counts too).

Just to clarify: The opinions on that thread (if you include all
versions of the series) were:

Andy, Daniel for keeping "broken
Julien, Jan, Stefano, George: for changing "broken"

That's the "2 (+) / 4 split" I referred to (The "(+)" being the people
who agreed with Andy in private).  Regarding voting, I was only
counting the maintainers of the code in question; it coming under THE
REST, that would include everyone except Daniel; hence 1 - 4.  Not at
all that Daniel's opinion doesn't matter, but that from a governance
perspective, it's the maintainers (and then the committers) who get
votes in the case of a formal escalation.

 -George