[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [XEN PATCH v6] arm/bitops: encapsulate violation of MISRA C:2012 Rule 10.1

To: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 18:22:47 +0100
Cc: sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx, michal.orzel@xxxxxxx, xenia.ragiadakou@xxxxxxx, ayan.kumar.halder@xxxxxxx, consulting@xxxxxxxxxxx, bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx, Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 17:22:59 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

Hi Nicola,

On 29/11/2023 10:32, Nicola Vetrini wrote:

The definitions of ffs{l}? violate Rule 10.1, by using the well-known
pattern (x & -x); its usage is wrapped by the ISOLATE_LSB macro.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>



This is now committed.

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

References:
- [XEN PATCH v6] arm/bitops: encapsulate violation of MISRA C:2012 Rule 10.1
  - From: Nicola Vetrini

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] xen/arm: Move static event channel feature to a separate module
Next by Date: Re: [XEN PATCH v5 1/2] automation/eclair: make the docs for MISRA C:2012 Dir 4.1 visible to ECLAIR
Previous by thread: [XEN PATCH v6] arm/bitops: encapsulate violation of MISRA C:2012 Rule 10.1
Next by thread: [xen-unstable-smoke test] 183930: regressions - all pass
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.