 
	
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH][next] xen: privcmd: Replace zero-length array with flex-array member and use __counted_by
 On 11/16/23 15:08, Kees Cook wrote: On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 12:54:59PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:Fake flexible arrays (zero-length and one-element arrays) are deprecated, and should be replaced by flexible-array members. So, replace zero-length array with a flexible-array member in `struct privcmd_kernel_ioreq`. Also annotate array `ports` with `__counted_by()` to prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the `__counted_by` attribute. Flexible array members annotated with `__counted_by` can have their accesses bounds-checked at run-time via `CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS` (for array indexing) and `CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE` (for strcpy/memcpy-family functions). This fixes multiple -Warray-bounds warnings: drivers/xen/privcmd.c:1239:30: warning: array subscript i is outside array bounds of 'struct ioreq_port[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] drivers/xen/privcmd.c:1240:30: warning: array subscript i is outside array bounds of 'struct ioreq_port[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] drivers/xen/privcmd.c:1241:30: warning: array subscript i is outside array bounds of 'struct ioreq_port[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] drivers/xen/privcmd.c:1245:33: warning: array subscript i is outside array bounds of 'struct ioreq_port[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] drivers/xen/privcmd.c:1258:67: warning: array subscript i is outside array bounds of 'struct ioreq_port[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] This results in no differences in binary output. Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>Looks right to me. I can see the allocation: Yep, I always check for that; in particular, the 'counter' assignment. :) Do you want me to mention it in the changelog text? Thanks! -- Gustavo 
 
 | 
|  | Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |