Re: [XEN PATCH] xen/vPCI: address violation of MISRA C:2012 Rule 8.3

[Federico Serafini <federico.serafini@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 08/09/23 11:13, Federico Serafini wrote:
> Make function declaration consistent with the corresponding definition.
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Federico Serafini <federico.serafini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   xen/include/xen/vpci.h | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/vpci.h b/xen/include/xen/vpci.h
> index 0b8a2a3c74..d743d96a10 100644
> --- a/xen/include/xen/vpci.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/vpci.h
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ typedef int vpci_register_init_t(struct pci_dev *dev);
>                  __used_section(".data.vpci." p) = x
>   
>   /* Add vPCI handlers to device. */
> -int __must_check vpci_add_handlers(struct pci_dev *dev);
> +int __must_check vpci_add_handlers(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>   
>   /* Remove all handlers and free vpci related structures. */
>   void vpci_remove_device(struct pci_dev *pdev);
Are there any chances of getting an ack?

--
Federico Serafini, M.Sc.

Software Engineer, BUGSENG (http://bugseng.com)