[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 5/7] block/vdi: Clean up local variable shadowing
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Am 31.08.2023 um 15:25 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben: >> Local variables shadowing other local variables or parameters make the >> code needlessly hard to understand. Tracked down with -Wshadow=local. >> Clean up: delete inner declarations when they are actually redundant, >> else rename variables. >> >> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> @@ -700,7 +699,7 @@ nonallocating_write: >> /* One or more new blocks were allocated. */ >> VdiHeader *header; >> uint8_t *base; >> - uint64_t offset; >> + uint64_t offs; >> uint32_t n_sectors; >> >> g_free(block); >> @@ -723,11 +722,11 @@ nonallocating_write: >> bmap_first /= (SECTOR_SIZE / sizeof(uint32_t)); >> bmap_last /= (SECTOR_SIZE / sizeof(uint32_t)); >> n_sectors = bmap_last - bmap_first + 1; >> - offset = s->bmap_sector + bmap_first; >> + offs = s->bmap_sector + bmap_first; >> base = ((uint8_t *)&s->bmap[0]) + bmap_first * SECTOR_SIZE; >> logout("will write %u block map sectors starting from entry %u\n", >> n_sectors, bmap_first); >> - ret = bdrv_co_pwrite(bs->file, offset * SECTOR_SIZE, >> + ret = bdrv_co_pwrite(bs->file, offs * SECTOR_SIZE, >> n_sectors * SECTOR_SIZE, base, 0); >> } > > Having two variables 'offset' and 'offs' doesn't really help with > clarity either. Can we be more specific and use something like > 'bmap_offset' here? Sure!
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |