|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 5/7] block/vdi: Clean up local variable shadowing
Kevin Wolf <kwolf@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Am 31.08.2023 um 15:25 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
>> Local variables shadowing other local variables or parameters make the
>> code needlessly hard to understand. Tracked down with -Wshadow=local.
>> Clean up: delete inner declarations when they are actually redundant,
>> else rename variables.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>> @@ -700,7 +699,7 @@ nonallocating_write:
>> /* One or more new blocks were allocated. */
>> VdiHeader *header;
>> uint8_t *base;
>> - uint64_t offset;
>> + uint64_t offs;
>> uint32_t n_sectors;
>>
>> g_free(block);
>> @@ -723,11 +722,11 @@ nonallocating_write:
>> bmap_first /= (SECTOR_SIZE / sizeof(uint32_t));
>> bmap_last /= (SECTOR_SIZE / sizeof(uint32_t));
>> n_sectors = bmap_last - bmap_first + 1;
>> - offset = s->bmap_sector + bmap_first;
>> + offs = s->bmap_sector + bmap_first;
>> base = ((uint8_t *)&s->bmap[0]) + bmap_first * SECTOR_SIZE;
>> logout("will write %u block map sectors starting from entry %u\n",
>> n_sectors, bmap_first);
>> - ret = bdrv_co_pwrite(bs->file, offset * SECTOR_SIZE,
>> + ret = bdrv_co_pwrite(bs->file, offs * SECTOR_SIZE,
>> n_sectors * SECTOR_SIZE, base, 0);
>> }
>
> Having two variables 'offset' and 'offs' doesn't really help with
> clarity either. Can we be more specific and use something like
> 'bmap_offset' here?
Sure!
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |