[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [XEN PATCH] x86/ACPI: Ignore entries with invalid APIC IDs when parsing MADT
- To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 10:36:12 +0200
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=kmL7Jeg5F6aabbSSkb+chV53w/nKTUTcGVIeaubMQbg=; b=NRLQTdUVSui13gF7fBASXsJ1stgEApjxTx96jbND2h9tC42BH6J/gUxBLtunbuCP4lDnOQRk7h6IOUVqPIxk9OxNBWWUElsErGqBzOxiiJ5XB5NAOGYki+H534//5TaZuYb1G6H12o3KABf4Bqh6XgR+GkRnn+PEPlztisl1Yu3UvGiZgVSYEka9l+5OlsxDRusUEIDgD8khuiZPpu+bWX6EiL7JlzhUxNfxFdHMMO9R8FjzoL5V6VI1Soxh77kVcoxJvac4SpTGlikgdsUZqIYtb3t2BxqS9ijVcdJA0WQXbbn+1QCBQk9ZsvSk4ymFw5DW0gkcPTfP+jWgZiDoQQ==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=b+ZTpXZuQBzvdyxfg4Z4rqsWDzUzgtrqV95A/PLsGyGXSpNm4KGNWhKR9MogN0ojqiOCMY9WK8ZXxYry2WZnTGsYBZannpop/bPhfhCEFdNGecwhGe579vJozBRZZcaniEbFGt5oIFOGyYND/pSeqr7nGYwbpv3crWklVT2+zFpiO7mplE9qsPW1T96KEoiiSk/bUv/Fv4G2kbvoKi8ouMsJKdR32cpk77TKaz/X70a2TZphS6Av53/cbN7tA/CJhdzxdTWDDdn7mg0eBYef4LLVBcimlVrgeIYpFzPiZu1GhK4YNtVlkRteOESGiKJcdX3U/163YxlDd9UtkfDwfA==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Cc: Simon Gaiser <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "committers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <committers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 08:36:20 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 12.09.2023 10:33, Jan Beulich wrote:
> And note how I offered a compromise by someone (Simon, you, Roger, or yet
> someone else) sending a patch against SUPPORT.md. Yet that hasn't happened.
> I therefore continue to be of the opinion that I can rightfully revert the
> patch, based on process not having been followed and alternative actions
> not having been taken.
Hmm, I now see that Stefano has actually sent such a patch, just not on a
fresh thread. With that acked and committed, the primary reason to revert
will disappear. I'll mention the other aspect in a reply to Simon.
Jan
|
