Re: [XEN PATCH v2 2/3] vpci/msix: make 'get_slot' static

[Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 17/08/2023 14:39, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> The function can become static since it's used only within this file.
> This also resolves a violation of MISRA C:2012 Rule 8.4 due to the 
> absence
> of a declaration before the function definition.
>
> Fixes: b177892d2d0e ("vpci/msix: handle accesses adjacent to the MSI-X 
> table")
> Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Corrected wrong prefix in the commit subject.
>
> CC-ing maintainers from "THE REST" as well, perhaps this trivial change 
> can go
> in straight away.
> ---
>  xen/drivers/vpci/msix.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/drivers/vpci/msix.c b/xen/drivers/vpci/msix.c
> index 25bde77586a4..f9df506f29bf 100644
> --- a/xen/drivers/vpci/msix.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/msix.c
> @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static void __iomem *get_table(const struct vpci
> *vpci, unsigned int slot)
>      return msix->table[slot];
>  }
>
> -unsigned int get_slot(const struct vpci *vpci, unsigned long addr)
> +static unsigned int get_slot(const struct vpci *vpci, unsigned long 
> addr)
>  {
>      unsigned long pfn = PFN_DOWN(addr);
>
> --
> 2.34.1
Any chance of an ack? The maintainer for that file is Roger Pau Monné as 
far as I can tell.
--
Nicola Vetrini, BSc
Software Engineer, BUGSENG srl (https://bugseng.com)