[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] xen/vpci: header: avoid cast for value passed to vpci_read_val
- To: Stewart Hildebrand <stewart.hildebrand@xxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 09:29:10 +0200
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=yJjTBGqemckn23wQCNIxxZBrUtQYdxRuFxvcsDzXO/k=; b=T8ZtP2Iljf4hGwwo7HHwtI6AYrzrqBr9oou+y9I3jk1QIz9uhKAcPK/Gydf/5o/SgoHsP6YwHsOPOgxHIi49ofniNNwQlvjFC1ItUMpzz7F6IWRvLBUgB8Yjh3zo1NNT7Pyfh9q6AzcxbUbyY6Lx16QzxcLQXALw+P3jddeNUrDyEqbRp2ficevpg9cVjyR9MFFLQVF7jOcuy+A6PLBlvN3vk4kA5IBg4aRq2rxtx8JVCPX6qTr0DM9z8kNgQjUy5wddxKbPIJlW/DGx6cFtyUiHN/nZT2TbJAz0ul0CwmQ4Be6hmupcFuqe6mlsCZ+iS3V6qerJqJzFtPwvETbdJw==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=C2Jz5QHbxO1kqfYfhaZwH98cRBUWCOitAVdoPnrnjmr46TiEZT4l5m6OUKuieJPkiC+wUxqqJBQXn4Xb8Zya2S22aTV1WAzDZMVX7EAS0L3uhMvw4r8CR4V5DniNGx1CO1Bu6vd2VrfEPGMjCjl9ysf8GI2Yk4gwgIVK8YI08aljsk3YTlPIWrdfrlUGeMeTXKTAOleU6zGczBZjF/tkcRz6+ihjdchAwyPedcxgYulJxyUnF+8EiFBh2sAupwTKiHsoPwPHjtNBj1NsiM5w3drg5J2oRjp+/R0Im4r2Xp52CEW05Nd0m8kQHUrBPmMVQyThgiycBMrNe7q7ak4WkA==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Cc: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 07:29:18 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 16.08.2023 20:50, Stewart Hildebrand wrote:
> The only purpose of this is to give an idea of what it might look like to
> introduce a new memory allocation in order to get rid of the casts for the
> value
> passed to vpci_read_val. If this is deemed preferable vs the casts, I will
> squash it for the next version of the series.
I would say this isn't worth it, but it'll be Roger to ultimately judge.
Jan
|
