| 
    
 [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [XEN PATCH v11 11/14] xen/arm: ffa: improve lock granularity
 Hi Jens,
> On 31 Jul 2023, at 14:15, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> The single lock in struct ffa_ctx is complemented with rx_lock and tx_lock.
> 
> The old lock is used for small critical sections, like increasing
> shm_count or adding another shm to shm_list.
> 
> rx_lock and tx_lock are only acquired using spin_trylock() which for
> well-behaving guests should always succeed. Guests using the RX and TX
> buffers are expected to serialize accesses before doing the FF-A
> request.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx>
Cheers
Bertrand
> ---
> v10->v11
> - No changes except resolving conflicts since "xen/arm: ffa: support
>  sharing large memory ranges" was dropped.
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa.c b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa.c
> index 75700938c444..eb4a58fec470 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa.c
> @@ -363,6 +363,13 @@ struct ffa_ctx {
>     struct list_head shm_list;
>     /* Number of allocated shared memory object */
>     unsigned int shm_count;
> +    /*
> +     * tx_lock is used to serialize access to tx
> +     * rx_lock is used to serialize access to rx
> +     * lock is used for the rest in this struct
> +     */
> +    spinlock_t tx_lock;
> +    spinlock_t rx_lock;
>     spinlock_t lock;
> };
> 
> @@ -768,7 +775,9 @@ static int32_t handle_partition_info_get(uint32_t w1, 
> uint32_t w2, uint32_t w3,
>     if ( !ffa_rx )
>         return FFA_RET_DENIED;
> 
> -    spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
> +    if ( !spin_trylock(&ctx->rx_lock) )
> +        return FFA_RET_BUSY;
> +
>     if ( !ctx->page_count || !ctx->rx_is_free )
>         goto out;
>     spin_lock(&ffa_rx_buffer_lock);
> @@ -819,7 +828,7 @@ out_rx_release:
> out_rx_buf_unlock:
>     spin_unlock(&ffa_rx_buffer_lock);
> out:
> -    spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
> +    spin_unlock(&ctx->rx_lock);
> 
>     return ret;
> }
> @@ -830,13 +839,15 @@ static int32_t handle_rx_release(void)
>     struct domain *d = current->domain;
>     struct ffa_ctx *ctx = d->arch.tee;
> 
> -    spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
> +    if ( !spin_trylock(&ctx->rx_lock) )
> +        return FFA_RET_BUSY;
> +
>     if ( !ctx->page_count || ctx->rx_is_free )
>         goto out;
>     ret = FFA_RET_OK;
>     ctx->rx_is_free = true;
> out:
> -    spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
> +    spin_unlock(&ctx->rx_lock);
> 
>     return ret;
> }
> @@ -947,21 +958,43 @@ static void put_shm_pages(struct ffa_shm_mem *shm)
>     }
> }
> 
> +static bool inc_ctx_shm_count(struct ffa_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> +    bool ret = true;
> +
> +    spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
> +    if (ctx->shm_count >= FFA_MAX_SHM_COUNT)
> +        ret = false;
> +    else
> +        ctx->shm_count++;
> +    spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
> +
> +    return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void dec_ctx_shm_count(struct ffa_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> +    spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
> +    ASSERT(ctx->shm_count > 0);
> +    ctx->shm_count--;
> +    spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
> +}
> +
> static struct ffa_shm_mem *alloc_ffa_shm_mem(struct ffa_ctx *ctx,
>                                              unsigned int page_count)
> {
>     struct ffa_shm_mem *shm;
> 
> -    if ( page_count >= FFA_MAX_SHM_PAGE_COUNT ||
> -         ctx->shm_count >= FFA_MAX_SHM_COUNT )
> +    if ( page_count >= FFA_MAX_SHM_PAGE_COUNT )
> +        return NULL;
> +    if ( !inc_ctx_shm_count(ctx) )
>         return NULL;
> 
>     shm = xzalloc_flex_struct(struct ffa_shm_mem, pages, page_count);
>     if ( shm )
> -    {
> -        ctx->shm_count++;
>         shm->page_count = page_count;
> -    }
> +    else
> +        dec_ctx_shm_count(ctx);
> 
>     return shm;
> }
> @@ -971,8 +1004,7 @@ static void free_ffa_shm_mem(struct ffa_ctx *ctx, struct 
> ffa_shm_mem *shm)
>     if ( !shm )
>         return;
> 
> -    ASSERT(ctx->shm_count > 0);
> -    ctx->shm_count--;
> +    dec_ctx_shm_count(ctx);
>     put_shm_pages(shm);
>     xfree(shm);
> }
> @@ -1180,7 +1212,11 @@ static void handle_mem_share(struct cpu_user_regs 
> *regs)
>         goto out_set_ret;
>     }
> 
> -    spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
> +    if ( !spin_trylock(&ctx->tx_lock) )
> +    {
> +        ret = FFA_RET_BUSY;
> +        goto out_set_ret;
> +    }
> 
>     if ( frag_len > ctx->page_count * FFA_PAGE_SIZE )
>         goto out_unlock;
> @@ -1272,7 +1308,9 @@ static void handle_mem_share(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
>     if ( ret )
>         goto out;
> 
> +    spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
>     list_add_tail(&shm->list, &ctx->shm_list);
> +    spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
> 
>     uint64_to_regpair(&handle_hi, &handle_lo, shm->handle);
> 
> @@ -1280,7 +1318,7 @@ out:
>     if ( ret )
>         free_ffa_shm_mem(ctx, shm);
> out_unlock:
> -    spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
> +    spin_unlock(&ctx->tx_lock);
> 
> out_set_ret:
>     if ( ret == 0)
> @@ -1289,6 +1327,18 @@ out_set_ret:
>             set_regs_error(regs, ret);
> }
> 
> +/* Must only be called with ctx->lock held */
> +static struct ffa_shm_mem *find_shm_mem(struct ffa_ctx *ctx, uint64_t handle)
> +{
> +    struct ffa_shm_mem *shm;
> +
> +    list_for_each_entry(shm, &ctx->shm_list, list)
> +        if ( shm->handle == handle )
> +            return shm;
> +
> +    return NULL;
> +}
> +
> static int handle_mem_reclaim(uint64_t handle, uint32_t flags)
> {
>     struct domain *d = current->domain;
> @@ -1299,29 +1349,26 @@ static int handle_mem_reclaim(uint64_t handle, 
> uint32_t flags)
>     int ret;
> 
>     spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
> -    list_for_each_entry(shm, &ctx->shm_list, list)
> -    {
> -        if ( shm->handle == handle )
> -            goto found_it;
> -    }
> -    shm = NULL;
> -    ret = FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
> -    goto out;
> -found_it:
> +    shm = find_shm_mem(ctx, handle);
> +    if ( shm )
> +        list_del(&shm->list);
> +    spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
> +    if ( !shm )
> +        return FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
> 
>     uint64_to_regpair(&handle_hi, &handle_lo, handle);
>     ret = ffa_mem_reclaim(handle_lo, handle_hi, flags);
> +
>     if ( ret )
>     {
> -        shm = NULL;
> -        goto out;
> +        spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
> +        list_add_tail(&shm->list, &ctx->shm_list);
> +        spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
> +    }
> +    else
> +    {
> +        free_ffa_shm_mem(ctx, shm);
>     }
> -
> -    list_del(&shm->list);
> -
> -out:
> -    free_ffa_shm_mem(ctx, shm);
> -    spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
> 
>     return ret;
> }
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
  | 
  
![]()  | 
            
         Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our  |