[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] libxl: slightly correct JSON generation of CPU policy
- To: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 15:28:11 +0100
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=citrix.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=citrix.com; dkim=pass header.d=citrix.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=op7fmsKIY4P+WA7qkSZjCTP8AaRLx3zFQv6rLJXz8uQ=; b=YS45AawA7T4TdrwZI3KK/63h9RzdULXOgU88rOsq/N8R9lKqYZ4tsjWzg1Xm7aX8/ISKainnro3X9nO3zx5HDtCeL0K1BXmeYWXeC4br73EvL7CLUu4d+qdbXeDcU+HMNfJD7Q4FdL71rTvZQyb4Um6nXn4W9O0aZ1LkZJSPXpyKACF0Dk+C8W2/tS2BBn6WSkPSjo9JNXwUZtRxiwkfWUZ5tyqOFKD0Hf60pMHl0YRqfLuTfav7/fJvkftsDtrxtMLOw3jCNhtvNe6LvYWbC5w3GEPvuwizTZrkc5mcEq8MmxsTKjj6JfoMUQnaV58Dvp5kNIXNpGh5mUSUHVUYCw==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=MLrPrEa+TdJUD4CqT5LZaL4vTGvJARzUe4EcoLrA1L8aPI3vQKuRO5b2/ugXPMTkGTPNH48PmPR/rYyOJYhnbgmDFJWPnCPbXSHqJjJEQ5dOgVxTrt9ssOeydtBkZFuEAlKUshZWd/FItmp+MANvSEGPCOSCEJk2AtGlASbhQnIb8xHOIJJMWNfLcsMmDLGO8WezjIf3ZIjrVKoQbrA9fmLUlsG5jKV0cxMoY6VME+qoRY7th27g0IQc+LbmZGSViolml4+WlJ6lDIktI+kB8h0Pac4e5y7IaqGPqpt6lbP48pq5Z7vhcOuuICpx7z4zHDtz+o+XVxUOJu++ld4isA==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=citrix.com;
- Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 14:28:32 +0000
- Ironport-data: A9a23:5otITakCMgT42K4FhZSLl07o5gy8J0RdPkR7XQ2eYbSJt1+Wr1Gzt xIeW2HUb/3eZGGgeop0b9i1pBkF6sSDndNkGlE6pSE2EyMWpZLJC+rCIxarNUt+DCFhoGFPt JxCN4aafKjYaleG+39B55C49SEUOZmgH+a6U6icfHgqH2eIcQ954Tp7gek1n4V0ttawBgKJq LvartbWfVSowFaYCEpNg064gE0p5K2aVA8w5ARkPqgb5QKGzhH5MbpETU2PByqgKmVrNrbSq 9brlNmR4m7f9hExPdKp+p6TnpoiG+O60aCm0xK6aoD66vRwjnVaPpUTbZLwXXx/mTSR9+2d/ f0W3XCGpaXFCYWX8AgVe0Ew/yiTpsSq8pefSZS0mZT7I0Er7xIAahihZa07FdRwxwp5PY1B3 dZBNSAwfiGNvOf14r66TuUrvf84Dta+aevzulk4pd3YJdAPZMmZBoD1v5pf1jp2gd1SF/HDY cZfcSBocBnLfxxIPBEQFY46m+CrwHL4dlW0qnrM/fZxvzeVklI3jOaF3Nn9I7RmQe18mEqCq 32A1GP+GhwAb/SUyCaf82LqjejK9c/+cNtLROfhpqU22jV/wEQ2US8NTmCEj8Kymw2Sau8EJ H0U6nEx+P1aGEuDC4OVsweDiHyOswMYWtFQO/Yn8wzLwa3Riy6JC25BQjNfZdgOsM4tWSdsx lKPh8nuBzFkrPuSU3313qiQhSO/P24SN2BqTS0LVwwe+PH4vZo+yBnIS75e/LWdi9T0HXT13 GqMpS1n3bEL15ZXieO84EzNhC+qqt7RVAkp6w7LX2WjqARkeIqiYI/u4l/ehRpdELukopC6l CBss6CjAComVPlhSATlrD0xIYyU
- Ironport-hdrordr: A9a23:BWiSXq3lNzo3NYFsU8uBngqjBJkkLtp133Aq2lEZdPU1SL38qy nKpp536faaslossR0b9uxoQZPwOE80lqQFg7X5X43DYOCOggLBEGgF1+XfKlbbak7DH4BmtJ uIRJIObOEYXWIQsS8j2njCLz/7+qjgzEl0v5a4856wd3ATV0i/1XYCNjqm
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 15/08/2023 3:26 pm, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 02:35:55PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> The "cpuid_empty" label is also (in principle; maybe only for rubbish
>> input) reachable in the "cpuid_only" case. Hence the label needs to live
>> ahead of the check of the variable.
>>
>> Fixes: 5b80cecb747b ("libxl: introduce MSR data in libxl_cpuid_policy")
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hmm - this was included in the security backports. I guess it ought to
go back to 4.15 (now that 4.14 is properly dead).
~Andrew
|
