Re: [PATCH 00/22] Cleanup and splitting of xl.cfg parsing

[Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Elliott,

On 03/08/2023 17:13, Elliott Mitchell wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 10:35:53AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > Some of the patches looks to have been posted previously as a 7-patch
> > series. It would have been nice if therefore this one was marked as
> > v2, indicating in a revision log what the differences are. It appears
> > as if at least one out of those 7 earlier patches was dropped (or
> > maybe assimilated into another one).
> Indeed.  Problem is several tags could potentially have been used.
> Should I have used all of them simultaneously?  Should I have used only
> some of them?  Which subset?
>
> Several were mildly adjusted, so it could have been marked "v2".
>
> No one responded at all to the previous round, so this could have been
> marked "RESEND".
>
> Yet the refinements and general changes are large enough for the series
> to be pretty distinct.
>
> I didn't know which way to go, so with no idea which option to choose the
> last one ended up winning out.  Perhaps that was wrong yet I've still no
> feedback on the actual patches.
Not sure if this is related to the lack of answer. But I didn't receive 
any of your patches via xen-devel (I received your replies). Skimming 
through the bounce for the xenproject mail server, I noticed a lot of 
the following:
    host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [142.250.123.26]
    SMTP error from remote mail server after pipelined end of data:
    550-5.7.1 This message is not RFC 5322 compliant. There are 
multiple Cc headers.
    550-5.7.1 To reduce the amount of spam sent to Gmail, this message 
has been
    550-5.7.1 blocked. Please visit
    550 5.7.1 
https://support.google.com/mail/?p=RfcMessageNonCompliant 
t7-20020a81e447000000b005839e8b595dsi12027284ywl.554 - gsmtp
It might be possible that other mail server are not happy with your e-mails.

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall