|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [XEN PATCH 03/11] x86/uaccess: move declarations to address MISRA C:2012 Rule 2.1
On Wed, 2 Aug 2023, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> The variable declarations inside macros {put,get}_unsafe_size are
> considered unreachable code, as they appear in a switch statement, before
> any clause. They are moved in the enclosing scope to resolve the violation.
>
> No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> xen/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
> b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
> index 684fccd95c..a2aaab1e87 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
> @@ -191,11 +191,12 @@ struct __large_struct { unsigned long buf[100]; };
>
> #define put_unsafe_size(x, ptr, size, grd, retval, errret) \
> do { \
> + long dummy_; \
> + \
> retval = 0; \
> stac(); \
> switch ( size ) \
> { \
> - long dummy_; \
> case 1: \
> put_unsafe_asm(x, ptr, grd, retval, "b", "b", "iq", errret); \
> break; \
> @@ -218,11 +219,12 @@ do {
> \
>
> #define get_unsafe_size(x, ptr, size, grd, retval, errret) \
> do { \
> + long dummy_; \
> + \
> retval = 0; \
> stac(); \
> switch ( size ) \
> { \
> - long dummy_; \
> case 1: get_unsafe_asm(x, ptr, grd, retval, "b", "=q", errret); break; \
> case 2: get_unsafe_asm(x, ptr, grd, retval, "w", "=r", errret); break; \
> case 4: get_unsafe_asm(x, ptr, grd, retval, "k", "=r", errret); break; \
> --
> 2.34.1
>
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |