[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2] xen/arm: Move TEE mediators in a kconfig submenu
Hi,
On 21/07/2023 13:28, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
On 21 Jul 2023, at 12:00, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Bertrand,
On 21/07/2023 10:23, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
Rework TEE mediators to put them under a submenu in Kconfig.
The submenu is only visible if UNSUPPORTED is activated as all currently
existing mediators are UNSUPPORTED.
While there rework a bit the configuration so that OP-TEE and FF-A
mediators are selecting the generic TEE interface instead of depending
on it.
Make the TEE option hidden as it is of no interest for anyone to select
it without one of the mediators so having them select it instead should
be enough.
Rework makefile inclusion and selection so that generic TEE is included
only when selected and include the tee Makefile all the time making the
directory tee self contained.
Is this a left over?
Oups yes, please remove.
Signed-off-by: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v2:
- only included tee subdirectory in makefile if CONFIG_TEE is selected
(reverts to state before patch)
- remove help in hidden TEE config
- rebase on top of staging
---
xen/arch/arm/Kconfig | 7 -------
xen/arch/arm/tee/Kconfig | 17 ++++++++++++++---
xen/arch/arm/tee/Makefile | 2 +-
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig b/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig
index 439cc94f3344..fd57a82dd284 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -175,13 +175,6 @@ config ARM64_BTI
Branch Target Identification support.
This feature is not supported in Xen.
-config TEE
- bool "Enable TEE mediators support (UNSUPPORTED)" if UNSUPPORTED
- default n
- help
- This option enables generic TEE mediators support. It allows guests
- to access real TEE via one of TEE mediators implemented in XEN.
-
source "arch/arm/tee/Kconfig"
config STATIC_SHM
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/tee/Kconfig b/xen/arch/arm/tee/Kconfig
index db3ea78faaaa..c5b0f88d7522 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/tee/Kconfig
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/tee/Kconfig
@@ -1,7 +1,14 @@
+menu "TEE mediators"
+ visible if UNSUPPORTED
+
+config TEE
+ bool
+ default n
+
config OPTEE
- bool "Enable OP-TEE mediator"
+ bool "Enable OP-TEE mediator (UNSUPPORTED)" if UNSUPPORTED
default n
- depends on TEE
+ select TEE
help
Enable the OP-TEE mediator. It allows guests to access
OP-TEE running on your platform. This requires
@@ -12,10 +19,14 @@ config OPTEE
config FFA
bool "Enable FF-A mediator support (UNSUPPORTED)" if UNSUPPORTED
default n
- depends on ARM_64 && TEE
+ depends on ARM_64
+ select TEE
help
This option enables a minimal FF-A mediator. The mediator is
generic as it follows the FF-A specification [1], but it only
implements a small subset of the specification.
[1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0077/latest
+
+endmenu
+
diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/tee/Makefile b/xen/arch/arm/tee/Makefile
index 58a1015e40e0..1ef49a271fdb 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/tee/Makefile
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/tee/Makefile
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
obj-$(CONFIG_FFA) += ffa.o
-obj-y += tee.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_TEE) += tee.o
obj-$(CONFIG_OPTEE) += optee.o
Same here? The rest LGTM and I would be happy to do the changes on commit.
This one is not, I think it is more logic to keep that one like this so that if
someone
creates a TEE not depending on this it could still put it here without
compiling tee.o
for no reason.
This seems pretty unlikely to me because the purpose of TEE is to
provide a generic interface to the common code. At least, the developer
would need to have a very good reason to diverge.
Also, right now, make will not recurse to the directory tee if
CONFIG_TEE=n. So I would rather not have this change.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
|