|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [XEN PATCH v10 12/24] xen/arm: ffa: send guest events to Secure Partitions
Hi Jens,
> On 17 Jul 2023, at 09:20, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The FF-A specification defines framework messages sent as direct
> requests when certain events occurs. For instance when a VM (guest) is
> created or destroyed. Only SPs which have subscribed to these events
> will receive them. An SP can subscribe to these messages in its
> partition properties.
>
> Adds a check that the SP supports the needed FF-A features
> FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET and FFA_RX_RELEASE.
>
> The partition properties of each SP is retrieved with
> FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET which returns the information in our RX buffer.
> Using FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET changes the owner of the RX buffer to the
> caller (us), so once we're done with the buffer it must be released
> using FFA_RX_RELEASE before another call can be made.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa.c | 233 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 231 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa.c b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa.c
> index f8ccaabc568d..d755363de686 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/tee/ffa.c
> @@ -160,14 +160,33 @@
> #define FFA_MSG_SEND 0x8400006EU
> #define FFA_MSG_POLL 0x8400006AU
>
> +/* Partition information descriptor */
> +struct ffa_partition_info_1_1 {
> + uint16_t id;
> + uint16_t execution_context;
> + uint32_t partition_properties;
> + uint8_t uuid[16];
> +};
> +
> struct ffa_ctx {
> /* FF-A version used by the guest */
> uint32_t guest_vers;
> + /*
> + * Number of SPs that we have sent a VM created signal to, used in
> + * ffa_domain_teardown() to know which SPs need to be signalled.
> + */
> + uint16_t create_signal_count;
> };
>
> /* Negotiated FF-A version to use with the SPMC */
> static uint32_t __ro_after_init ffa_version;
>
> +/* SPs subscribing to VM_CREATE and VM_DESTROYED events */
> +static uint16_t *subscr_vm_created __read_mostly;
> +static uint16_t subscr_vm_created_count __read_mostly;
> +static uint16_t *subscr_vm_destroyed __read_mostly;
> +static uint16_t subscr_vm_destroyed_count __read_mostly;
> +
> /*
> * Our rx/tx buffers shared with the SPMC. FFA_RXTX_PAGE_COUNT is the
> * number of pages used in each of these buffers.
> @@ -251,6 +270,87 @@ static int32_t ffa_rxtx_map(paddr_t tx_addr, paddr_t
> rx_addr,
> return ffa_simple_call(FFA_RXTX_MAP_64, tx_addr, rx_addr, page_count, 0);
> }
>
> +static int32_t ffa_partition_info_get(uint32_t w1, uint32_t w2, uint32_t w3,
> + uint32_t w4, uint32_t w5,
> + uint32_t *count)
> +{
> + const struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs arg = {
> + .a0 = FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET,
> + .a1 = w1,
> + .a2 = w2,
> + .a3 = w3,
> + .a4 = w4,
> + .a5 = w5,
> + };
> + struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs resp;
> + uint32_t ret;
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_2_smc(&arg, &resp);
> +
> + ret = get_ffa_ret_code(&resp);
> + if ( !ret )
> + *count = resp.a2;
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int32_t ffa_rx_release(void)
> +{
> + return ffa_simple_call(FFA_RX_RELEASE, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static int32_t ffa_direct_req_send_vm(uint16_t sp_id, uint16_t vm_id,
> + uint8_t msg)
> +{
> + uint32_t exp_resp = FFA_MSG_FLAG_FRAMEWORK;
> + unsigned int retry_count = 0;
> + int32_t res;
> +
> + if ( msg == FFA_MSG_SEND_VM_CREATED )
> + exp_resp |= FFA_MSG_RESP_VM_CREATED;
> + else if ( msg == FFA_MSG_SEND_VM_DESTROYED )
> + exp_resp |= FFA_MSG_RESP_VM_DESTROYED;
> + else
> + return FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
> +
> + do {
> + const struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs arg = {
> + .a0 = FFA_MSG_SEND_DIRECT_REQ_32,
> + .a1 = sp_id,
> + .a2 = FFA_MSG_FLAG_FRAMEWORK | msg,
> + .a5 = vm_id,
> + };
> + struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs resp;
> +
> + arm_smccc_1_2_smc(&arg, &resp);
> + if ( resp.a0 != FFA_MSG_SEND_DIRECT_RESP_32 || resp.a2 != exp_resp )
> + {
> + /*
> + * This is an invalid response, likely due to some error in the
> + * implementation of the ABI.
> + */
> + return FFA_RET_INVALID_PARAMETERS;
> + }
> + res = resp.a3;
> + if ( ++retry_count > 10 )
> + {
> + /*
> + * TODO
> + * FFA_RET_INTERRUPTED means that the SPMC has a pending
> + * non-secure interrupt, we need a way of delivering that
> + * non-secure interrupt.
> + * FFA_RET_RETRY is the SP telling us that it's temporarily
> + * blocked from handling the direct request, we need a generic
> + * way to deal with this.
> + * For now in both cases, give up after a few retries.
> + */
> + return res;
> + }
> + } while ( res == FFA_RET_INTERRUPTED || res == FFA_RET_RETRY );
> +
> + return res;
> +}
> +
> static uint16_t get_vm_id(const struct domain *d)
> {
> /* +1 since 0 is reserved for the hypervisor in FF-A */
> @@ -374,6 +474,8 @@ static bool ffa_handle_call(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
> static int ffa_domain_init(struct domain *d)
> {
> struct ffa_ctx *ctx;
> + unsigned int n;
> + int32_t res;
>
> if ( !ffa_version )
> return -ENODEV;
> @@ -387,20 +489,68 @@ static int ffa_domain_init(struct domain *d)
> ctx = xzalloc(struct ffa_ctx);
> if ( !ctx )
> return -ENOMEM;
> -
This line removal does not seem to be intended.
> d->arch.tee = ctx;
>
> + for ( n = 0; n < subscr_vm_created_count; n++ )
> + {
> + res = ffa_direct_req_send_vm(subscr_vm_created[n], get_vm_id(d),
> + FFA_MSG_SEND_VM_CREATED);
> + if ( res )
> + {
> + printk(XENLOG_ERR "ffa: Failed to report creation of vm_id %u to
> %u: res %d\n",
> + get_vm_id(d), subscr_vm_created[n], res);
> + ctx->create_signal_count = n;
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> + }
> + ctx->create_signal_count = n;
For clarity here, i would do:
signal_count = subscr_vm_created_count
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static bool is_in_subscr_list(const uint16_t *subscr, uint16_t start,
> + uint16_t end, uint16_t vm_id)
> +{
> + unsigned int n;
> +
> + for (n = start; n < end; n++)
Coding style, missing spaces
> + {
> + if (subscr[n] == vm_id)
Coding style, missing spaces
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> /* This function is supposed to undo what ffa_domain_init() has done */
> static int ffa_domain_teardown(struct domain *d)
> {
> struct ffa_ctx *ctx = d->arch.tee;
> + unsigned int n;
> + int32_t res;
>
> if ( !ctx )
> return 0;
>
> + for ( n = 0; n < subscr_vm_destroyed_count; n++ )
> + {
> + /*
> + * Skip SPs subscribed to the VM created event that never was
> + * notified of the VM creation due to an error during
> + * ffa_domain_init().
> + */
> + if ( is_in_subscr_list(subscr_vm_created, ctx->create_signal_count,
> + subscr_vm_created_count, get_vm_id(d)) )
> + continue;
I am not following the logic here and would need some explanations.
A SP is subscribing to be informed of any VM creation, but here you check
the list against the VM ID that is destroyed.
Also a SP could subscribe to be informed of VM destroyed but not VM created.
In my head the logic should be:
if (signal_count < subscr_vm_created_count)
for each sp in subscr_vm_created
if is_in_list subscr_vm_destroyed sp
send_destroyed
else
for each subscr_vm_destroyed
send_destroyed
> +
> + res = ffa_direct_req_send_vm(subscr_vm_destroyed[n], get_vm_id(d),
> + FFA_MSG_SEND_VM_DESTROYED);
> +
> + if ( res )
> + printk(XENLOG_ERR "ffa: Failed to report destruction of vm_id %u
> to %u: res %d\n",
> + get_vm_id(d), subscr_vm_destroyed[n], res);
> + }
> +
> XFREE(d->arch.tee);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -411,6 +561,81 @@ static int ffa_relinquish_resources(struct domain *d)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void uninit_subscribers(void)
> +{
> + subscr_vm_created_count = 0;
> + subscr_vm_destroyed_count = 0;
> + XFREE(subscr_vm_created);
> + XFREE(subscr_vm_destroyed);
> +}
> +
> +static bool init_subscribers(struct ffa_partition_info_1_1 *fpi, uint16_t
> count)
> +{
> + uint16_t n;
> + uint16_t c_pos;
> + uint16_t d_pos;
> +
> + subscr_vm_created_count = 0;
> + subscr_vm_destroyed_count = 0;
> + for ( n = 0; n < count; n++ )
> + {
> + if (fpi[n].partition_properties & FFA_PART_PROP_NOTIF_CREATED)
Coding style: spaces
> + subscr_vm_created_count++;
> + if (fpi[n].partition_properties & FFA_PART_PROP_NOTIF_DESTROYED)
Coding style: spaces
Cheers
Bertrand
> + subscr_vm_destroyed_count++;
> + }
> +
> + if ( subscr_vm_created_count )
> + subscr_vm_created = xzalloc_array(uint16_t, subscr_vm_created_count);
> + if ( subscr_vm_destroyed_count )
> + subscr_vm_destroyed = xzalloc_array(uint16_t,
> + subscr_vm_destroyed_count);
> + if ( (subscr_vm_created_count && !subscr_vm_created) ||
> + (subscr_vm_destroyed_count && !subscr_vm_destroyed) )
> + {
> + printk(XENLOG_ERR "ffa: Failed to allocate subscription lists\n");
> + uninit_subscribers();
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + for ( c_pos = 0, d_pos = 0, n = 0; n < count; n++ )
> + {
> + if ( fpi[n].partition_properties & FFA_PART_PROP_NOTIF_CREATED )
> + subscr_vm_created[c_pos++] = fpi[n].id;
> + if ( fpi[n].partition_properties & FFA_PART_PROP_NOTIF_DESTROYED )
> + subscr_vm_destroyed[d_pos++] = fpi[n].id;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool init_sps(void)
> +{
> + bool ret = false;
> + uint32_t count;
> + int e;
> +
> + e = ffa_partition_info_get(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &count);
> + if ( e )
> + {
> + printk(XENLOG_ERR "ffa: Failed to get list of SPs: %d\n", e);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if ( count >= UINT16_MAX )
> + {
> + printk(XENLOG_ERR "ffa: Impossible number of SPs: %u\n", count);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + ret = init_subscribers(ffa_rx, count);
> +
> +out:
> + ffa_rx_release();
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static bool ffa_probe(void)
> {
> uint32_t vers;
> @@ -462,7 +687,8 @@ static bool ffa_probe(void)
> * TODO: Rework the code to allow domain to use a subset of the
> * features supported.
> */
> - if (
> + if ( !check_mandatory_feature(FFA_PARTITION_INFO_GET) ||
> + !check_mandatory_feature(FFA_RX_RELEASE) ||
> !check_mandatory_feature(FFA_RXTX_MAP_64) ||
> !check_mandatory_feature(FFA_RXTX_UNMAP) ||
> !check_mandatory_feature(FFA_MSG_SEND_DIRECT_REQ_32) )
> @@ -484,6 +710,9 @@ static bool ffa_probe(void)
> }
> ffa_version = vers;
>
> + if ( !init_sps() )
> + goto err_free_ffa_tx;
> +
> return true;
>
> err_free_ffa_tx:
> --
> 2.34.1
>
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |