[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] swiotlb: make io_tlb_default_mem local to swiotlb.c
Oops, originally sent only to Robin. Restoring the recipient list here... On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 11:55:00 +0100 Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 27/06/2023 11:24 am, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 11:54:23AM +0200, Petr Tesarik wrote: > >> +/** > >> + * is_swiotlb_active() - check if the software IO TLB is initialized > >> + * @dev: Device to check, or %NULL for the default IO TLB. > >> + */ > >> bool is_swiotlb_active(struct device *dev) > >> { > >> - struct io_tlb_mem *mem = dev->dma_io_tlb_mem; > >> + struct io_tlb_mem *mem = dev > >> + ? dev->dma_io_tlb_mem > >> + : &io_tlb_default_mem; > > > > That's impossible to read and maintain over time, sorry. > > > > Please use real "if () else" lines, so that it can be maintained over > > time. > > Moreover, it makes for a horrible interface anyway. If there's a need > for a non-specific "is SWIOTLB present at all?" check unrelated to any > particular device (which arguably still smells of poking into > implementation details...), please encapsulate it in its own distinct > helper like, say, is_swiotlb_present(void). I'm sorry for writing two replies, but I realized too late that this part is unrelated to the MIPS Octeon platform. Xen is the only user of an "is SWIOTLB present" interface. IIUC Xen needs bounce buffers for the PCI frontend driver, but if there is no other reason to have a SWIOTLB, the system does not set up one at boot. Yeah, they should probably do things differently. At least this code in arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c is fishy: /* XXX: this switches the dma ops under live devices! */ dma_ops = &xen_swiotlb_dma_ops; However, I don't think it's up to me to fix that... To sum it up, I can certainly provide a separate function instead of overloading the is_swiotlb_active() API. Thanks for the suggestion! Petr T
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |