[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [XEN PATCH 06/13] xen/efi: fixed violations of MISRA C:2012 Rule 7.2
 
- To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
 
- From: Simone Ballarin <simone.ballarin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
 
- Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 11:27:57 +0200
 
- Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, consulting@xxxxxxxxxxx, 	Gianluca Luparini <gianluca.luparini@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, 	Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, 	Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Xenia Ragiadakou <Xenia.Ragiadakou@xxxxxxx>, 	Ayan Kumar <ayan.kumar.halder@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 
- Delivery-date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:28:19 +0000
 
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
 
 
 
 
 On 20.06.2023 22:56, Stefano Stabellini wrote: 
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2023, Jan Beulich wrote: 
>> On 20.06.2023 12:34, Simone Ballarin wrote: 
>>> From: Gianluca Luparini <gianluca.luparini@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
>>> 
>>> The xen sources contains violations of MISRA C:2012 Rule 7.2 whose headline states: 
>>> "A "u" or "U" suffix shall be applied to all integer constants that are represented in an unsigned type". 
>>> 
>>> I propose to use "U" as a suffix to explicitly state when an integer constant is represented in an unsigned type. 
>>> For homogeneity, I also added the "U" suffix in some cases that the tool didn't report as violations. 
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Simone Ballarin <simone.ballarin@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
>>> --- 
>>>  xen/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_64/efibind.h | 10 +++++----- 
>> 
>> This file as well as ... 
>> 
>>>  xen/common/efi/boot.c                     |  8 ++++---- 
>>>  xen/common/efi/runtime.c                  |  2 +- 
>>>  xen/include/efi/efiapi.h                  | 10 +++++----- 
>>>  xen/include/efi/efidef.h                  |  2 +- 
>>>  xen/include/efi/efiprot.h                 | 22 +++++++++++----------- 
>> 
>> ... the last three here are imported from the gnu-efi package. I'm wary 
>> of touching them, and thus getting them more out of sync with their 
>> original than strictly necessary. To allow the other changes to go in 
>> no matter what, I'd like to suggest splitting the patch. 
>  
> Should we add either those files individually or the directory 
> xen/include/efi (plus xen/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_64/efibind.h) to 
> docs/misra/exclude-list.json ? 
 
Probably, and in the former case imo the entire directory. 
 
Jan 
 Ok, I will remove all the changes in the "xen/include/efi" directory and "xen/arch/x86/include/asm/x86_64/efibind.h". --  
 
    
     |