[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Make sscanf() stricter
- To: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 18:34:36 +0300
- Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@xxxxxxxx>, Lee Jones <lee@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-staging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 15:35:10 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 04:40:40PM -0400, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
> Roger Pau Monné suggested making xenbus_scanf() stricter instead of
> using a custom parser. Christoph Hellwig asked why the normal vsscanf()
> cannot be made stricter. Richard Weinberger mentioned Linus Torvalds’s
> suggestion of using ! to allow overflow.
As Rasmus articulated, NAK w.o. test cases being added to all parts where your
changes touch.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
|
