[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] net: Provide MemReentrancyGuard * to qemu_new_nic()
On 2023/06/05 17:06, Alexander Bulekov wrote: On 230601 1218, Akihiko Odaki wrote:Recently MemReentrancyGuard was added to DeviceState to record that the device is engaging in I/O. The network device backend needs to update it when delivering a packet to a device. In preparation for such a change, add MemReentrancyGuard * as a parameter of qemu_new_nic(). Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki@xxxxxxxxxx>Reviewed-by: Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@xxxxxx> One minor comment below.--- include/net/net.h | 1 + hw/net/allwinner-sun8i-emac.c | 3 ++- hw/net/allwinner_emac.c | 3 ++- hw/net/cadence_gem.c | 3 ++- hw/net/dp8393x.c | 3 ++- hw/net/e1000.c | 3 ++- hw/net/e1000e.c | 2 +- hw/net/eepro100.c | 4 +++- hw/net/etraxfs_eth.c | 3 ++- hw/net/fsl_etsec/etsec.c | 3 ++- hw/net/ftgmac100.c | 3 ++- hw/net/i82596.c | 2 +- hw/net/igb.c | 2 +- hw/net/imx_fec.c | 2 +- hw/net/lan9118.c | 3 ++- hw/net/mcf_fec.c | 3 ++- hw/net/mipsnet.c | 3 ++- hw/net/msf2-emac.c | 3 ++- hw/net/mv88w8618_eth.c | 3 ++- hw/net/ne2000-isa.c | 3 ++- hw/net/ne2000-pci.c | 3 ++- hw/net/npcm7xx_emc.c | 3 ++- hw/net/opencores_eth.c | 3 ++- hw/net/pcnet.c | 3 ++- hw/net/rocker/rocker_fp.c | 4 ++-- hw/net/rtl8139.c | 3 ++- hw/net/smc91c111.c | 3 ++- hw/net/spapr_llan.c | 3 ++- hw/net/stellaris_enet.c | 3 ++- hw/net/sungem.c | 2 +- hw/net/sunhme.c | 3 ++- hw/net/tulip.c | 3 ++- hw/net/virtio-net.c | 6 ++++-- hw/net/vmxnet3.c | 2 +- hw/net/xen_nic.c | 4 ++-- hw/net/xgmac.c | 3 ++- hw/net/xilinx_axienet.c | 3 ++- hw/net/xilinx_ethlite.c | 3 ++- hw/usb/dev-network.c | 3 ++- net/net.c | 1 + 40 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/net/net.h b/include/net/net.h index 1448d00afb..a7d8deaccb 100644 --- a/include/net/net.h +++ b/include/net/net.h @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ NICState *qemu_new_nic(NetClientInfo *info, NICConf *conf, const char *model, const char *name, + MemReentrancyGuard *reentrancy_guard, void *opaque);Does it make sense to roll *reentrancy_guard into NICConf here? Probably no. All members of NICConf are device properties the user configure, but reentrancy_guard is an internal state. Similarly, the opaque parameter is an internal state and not included in NICConf.
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |