|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [XEN][PATCH v7 09/19] xen/iommu: Move spin_lock from iommu_dt_device_is_assigned to caller
On 02/06/2023 02:48, Vikram Garhwal wrote:
> Rename iommu_dt_device_is_assigned() to iommu_dt_device_is_assigned_locked().
> Remove static type so this can also be used by SMMU drivers to check if the
> device is being used before removing.
>
> Moving spin_lock to caller was done to prevent the concurrent access to
> iommu_dt_device_is_assigned while doing add/remove/assign/deassign.
Would be nice to explain the need of putting a prototype into a private header.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vikram Garhwal <vikram.garhwal@xxxxxxx>
>
> ---
> Changes from v6:
> Created a private header and moved iommu_dt_device_is_assigned() to
> header.
> ---
> xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> xen/include/xen/iommu-private.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 xen/include/xen/iommu-private.h
>
> diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c
> b/xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c
> index 1c32d7b50c..52e370db01 100644
> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/device_tree.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> #include <xen/device_tree.h>
> #include <xen/guest_access.h>
> #include <xen/iommu.h>
> +#include <xen/iommu-private.h>
> #include <xen/lib.h>
> #include <xen/sched.h>
> #include <xsm/xsm.h>
> @@ -83,16 +84,14 @@ fail:
> return rc;
> }
>
> -static bool_t iommu_dt_device_is_assigned(const struct dt_device_node *dev)
I would write a comment that this function expects to be called with
dtdevs_lock locked.
> +bool_t iommu_dt_device_is_assigned_locked(const struct dt_device_node *dev)
> {
> bool_t assigned = 0;
>
> if ( !dt_device_is_protected(dev) )
> return 0;
>
> - spin_lock(&dtdevs_lock);
> assigned = !list_empty(&dev->domain_list);
> - spin_unlock(&dtdevs_lock);
>
> return assigned;
> }
> @@ -213,27 +212,40 @@ int iommu_do_dt_domctl(struct xen_domctl *domctl,
> struct domain *d,
> if ( (d && d->is_dying) || domctl->u.assign_device.flags )
> break;
>
> + spin_lock(&dtdevs_lock);
> +
> ret = dt_find_node_by_gpath(domctl->u.assign_device.u.dt.path,
> domctl->u.assign_device.u.dt.size,
> &dev);
> if ( ret )
> + {
> + spin_unlock(&dtdevs_lock);
> break;
> + }
>
> ret = xsm_assign_dtdevice(XSM_HOOK, d, dt_node_full_name(dev));
> if ( ret )
> + {
> + spin_unlock(&dtdevs_lock);
> break;
> + }
>
> if ( domctl->cmd == XEN_DOMCTL_test_assign_device )
> {
> - if ( iommu_dt_device_is_assigned(dev) )
> +
> + if ( iommu_dt_device_is_assigned_locked(dev) )
> {
> printk(XENLOG_G_ERR "%s already assigned.\n",
> dt_node_full_name(dev));
> ret = -EINVAL;
> }
> +
> + spin_unlock(&dtdevs_lock);
> break;
> }
>
> + spin_unlock(&dtdevs_lock);
> +
> if ( d == dom_io )
> return -EINVAL;
>
> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/iommu-private.h b/xen/include/xen/iommu-private.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..5615decaff
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/iommu-private.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> + /*
incorrect indentation (<< 1)
> + * xen/iommu-private.h
> + *
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2023, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> + * Written by Vikram Garhwal <vikram.garhwal@xxxxxxx>
I'm not sure if placing the copyright is appropriate, given a single prototype
for a function
not really implemented by you with just spinlocks removed. But I might be wrong.
> + *
> + */
> +#ifndef __XEN_IOMMU_PRIVATE_H__
> +#define __XEN_IOMMU_PRIVATE_H__
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_DEVICE_TREE
> +#include <xen/device_tree.h>
> +bool_t iommu_dt_device_is_assigned_locked(const struct dt_device_node *dev);
> +#endif
> +
> +#endif /* __XEN_IOMMU_PRIVATE_H__ */
empty line here please
> +/*
> + * Local variables:
> + * mode: C
> + * c-file-style: "BSD"
> + * c-basic-offset: 4
> + * tab-width: 4
> + * indent-tabs-mode: nil
> + * End:
> + */
~Michal
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |