[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [XEN][PATCH v5 06/17] xen/device-tree: Add device_tree_find_node_by_path() to find nodes in device tree


  • To: Vikram Garhwal <vikram.garhwal@xxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 15:40:06 +0200
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 165.204.84.17) smtp.rcpttodomain=lists.xenproject.org smtp.mailfrom=amd.com; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine sp=quarantine pct=100) action=none header.from=amd.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=E2N7a2FPedQrW8HRhTsmPLwKB/iTYWUt1peWJYN7LVg=; b=B03Hk7CL/S0nMpEyH9roLfVJfLliktGvhM0AcuQX5eSTQ3nHGUK7iKUa2JrGhJnmTZMhsgcMEsWgUfc9Sll3tUS9uRKC4gNyTF9mybz2ENVM2TSIhQ3gQJy6ioe0n7enXsdZB9xKqvLbMVDPzgOz/ZAbPyw2ORMRaU085tPIlk+dVEJ44jeWAToKkS8nevyNcUDFwNOIBikl8wmiiPTItk/9fhj3cxbUjs3b2vVpaUN+AJ+chU4JNeRBu/qkx7v76Ei++Gn+lna0pluzselizkC5jx0W96e4rWAYDxzJFpG19p6xTO1KIqDtj2dnwnzDK7LCAkrJA0/Y76dlT1Tk7Q==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=j/EHzSU1RUuhpswNi2nUztmMWzsk7GkxZti2iDB5ceo7Hde6lFstFgo7+E1XTGYUzyl4JVUYRdWXxhiXKl//GenrkP5lG+5+V3gDBwSArRvSnSoujq386dheAdU8O5PwCAG8K2T3juapCk/gYVeniZuRKEBURX87B+0OVtKXfjnz2YhQ31b0RnMFf3T3p5q4khYvj46sdn/+/tjuyex+ddG3i1EHKbOSZiF6szz9ZwL3nGt4Gn9vB+QiMsJy3Ni9iX86Wqd0lDXfZ6bH66HPmvlRSqj/YYeAycgCe0oNXCGHfRKBZUJTxVswX2wSQMXmiUAaMa2fB6BOZMsGznio9A==
  • Cc: <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 13:40:32 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

Hi Vikram,

On 11/04/2023 21:16, Vikram Garhwal wrote:
> 
> 
> Add device_tree_find_node_by_path() to find a matching node with path for a
> dt_device_node.
> 
> Reason behind this function:
>     Each time overlay nodes are added using .dtbo, a new fdt(memcpy of
>     device_tree_flattened) is created and updated with overlay nodes. This
>     updated fdt is further unflattened to a dt_host_new. Next, we need to find
>     the overlay nodes in dt_host_new, find the overlay node's parent in 
> dt_host
>     and add the nodes as child under their parent in the dt_host. Thus we need
>     this function to search for node in different unflattened device trees.
You do not mention making dt_find_node_by_path() static inline.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Vikram Garhwal <vikram.garhwal@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  xen/common/device_tree.c      |  5 +++--
>  xen/include/xen/device_tree.h | 17 +++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/common/device_tree.c b/xen/common/device_tree.c
> index bf847b2584..507b4ac5b6 100644
> --- a/xen/common/device_tree.c
> +++ b/xen/common/device_tree.c
> @@ -358,11 +358,12 @@ struct dt_device_node *dt_find_node_by_type(struct 
> dt_device_node *from,
>      return np;
>  }
> 
> -struct dt_device_node *dt_find_node_by_path(const char *path)
> +struct dt_device_node *device_tree_find_node_by_path(struct dt_device_node 
> *dt,
> +                                                     const char *path)
>  {
>      struct dt_device_node *np;
> 
> -    dt_for_each_device_node(dt_host, np)
> +    dt_for_each_device_node(dt, np)
>          if ( np->full_name && (dt_node_cmp(np->full_name, path) == 0) )
>              break;
> 
> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h b/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h
> index 58ac12abe3..998f972ebc 100644
> --- a/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/device_tree.h
> @@ -534,13 +534,26 @@ struct dt_device_node *dt_find_node_by_type(struct 
> dt_device_node *from,
>  struct dt_device_node *dt_find_node_by_alias(const char *alias);
> 
>  /**
> - * dt_find_node_by_path - Find a node matching a full DT path
> + * device_tree_find_node_by_path - Generic function to find a node matching 
> the
> + * full DT path for any given unflatten device tree
> + * @dt_node: The device tree to search
This should be @dt to match the parameter. Also, shouldn't the description say:
"the node to start searching from"
or
"device tree root node"

FWICS, you expect to pass a root node as dt node. However, in 
device_tree_find_node_by_path()
you do not check if a provided node is a root node or not (e.g. no parent). Is 
this intended?

~Michal



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.