|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2] xen/console: Skip switching serial input to non existing domains
On 16/03/2023 12:11, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution
> when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>
>
> On 16.03.2023 11:26, Michal Orzel wrote:
>> --- a/xen/drivers/char/console.c
>> +++ b/xen/drivers/char/console.c
>> @@ -490,7 +490,24 @@ static void switch_serial_input(void)
>> }
>> else
>> {
>> - console_rx++;
>> + unsigned int next_rx = console_rx + 1;
>> +
>> + /* Skip switching serial input to non existing domains */
>> + while ( next_rx < max_init_domid + 1 )
>> + {
>> + struct domain *d = rcu_lock_domain_by_id(next_rx - 1);
>> +
>> + if ( d )
>> + {
>> + rcu_unlock_domain(d);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + next_rx++;
>> + }
>> +
>> + console_rx = next_rx;
>> +
>> printk("*** Serial input to DOM%d", console_rx - 1);
>> }
>
> While at the first glance (when you sent it in reply to v1) it looked okay,
> I'm afraid it really isn't: Please consider what happens when the last of
> the DomU-s doesn't exist anymore. (You don't really check whether it still
> exists, because the range check comes ahead of the existence one.) In that
> case you want to move from second-to-last to Xen. I expect the entire
> if/else construct wants to be inside the loop.
I did this deliberately because I do not think the situation you describe is
possible
(i.e. no domains at all - Xen still usable). With hardware domain in place, we
can e.g. destroy the domain
which would invoke domain_kill() -> domain_destroy() that would free domain
struct.
Without hwdom, the domain cannot kill/destroy itself. It can do the shutdown
but it will not
destroy it (at least this is what I tested). So I do not think there can be a
scenario where
there is not a single domain while Xen running and be usable.
~Michal
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |