[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] xen: introduce CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG_FRAME
> > > + void (*fn)(const struct cpu_user_regs *) = (void *)regs- > > >BUG_FN_REG; > > ... this, wouldn't it be better (and independent of the specific > arch) if > you checked for BUG_FN_REG being defined? > > Another (#ifdef-free) variant would be to have bug_ptr() take a 2nd > argument > and then uniformly use ... > > > +#else > > + void (*fn)(const struct cpu_user_regs *) = bug_ptr(bug); > > ... this, slightly altered to > > void (*fn)(const struct cpu_user_regs *) = bug_ptr(bug, > regs); I think that I will go with BUG_FN_REG instead of changing bug_ptr()'s arguments as bug_ptr() is used below to get file name so it won't be clear what bug_ptr() should return either an address of file name or regs->BUG_FN_REG. > > > +#endif > > + > > + fn(regs); > > + return 0; > > + } > > + > > + /* WARN, BUG or ASSERT: decode the filename pointer and line > > number. */ > > + filename = bug_ptr(bug); > > + if ( !is_kernel(filename) && !is_patch(filename) ) > ~ Oleksii
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |