|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 17/22] x86/setup: vmap heap nodes when they are outside the direct map
On Fri, 16 Dec 2022, Julien Grall wrote:
> From: Hongyan Xia <hongyxia@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> When we do not have a direct map, archs_mfn_in_direct_map() will always
> return false, thus init_node_heap() will allocate xenheap pages from an
> existing node for the metadata of a new node. This means that the
> metadata of a new node is in a different node, slowing down heap
> allocation.
>
> Since we now have early vmap, vmap the metadata locally in the new node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hongyan Xia <hongyxia@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <jgrall@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ----
>
> Changes from Hongyan's version:
> * arch_mfn_in_direct_map() was renamed to
> arch_mfns_in_direct_map()
> * Use vmap_contig_pages() rather than __vmap(...).
> * Add missing include (xen/vmap.h) so it compiles on Arm
> ---
> xen/common/page_alloc.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/common/page_alloc.c b/xen/common/page_alloc.c
> index 0c4af5a71407..581c15d74dfb 100644
> --- a/xen/common/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/xen/common/page_alloc.c
> @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@
> #include <xen/sched.h>
> #include <xen/softirq.h>
> #include <xen/spinlock.h>
> +#include <xen/vmap.h>
>
> #include <asm/flushtlb.h>
> #include <asm/numa.h>
> @@ -597,22 +598,43 @@ static unsigned long init_node_heap(int node, unsigned
> long mfn,
> needed = 0;
> }
> else if ( *use_tail && nr >= needed &&
> - arch_mfns_in_directmap(mfn + nr - needed, needed) &&
> (!xenheap_bits ||
> !((mfn + nr - 1) >> (xenheap_bits - PAGE_SHIFT))) )
> {
> - _heap[node] = mfn_to_virt(mfn + nr - needed);
> - avail[node] = mfn_to_virt(mfn + nr - 1) +
> - PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(**avail) * NR_ZONES;
> - }
> - else if ( nr >= needed &&
> - arch_mfns_in_directmap(mfn, needed) &&
> + if ( arch_mfns_in_directmap(mfn + nr - needed, needed) )
> + {
> + _heap[node] = mfn_to_virt(mfn + nr - needed);
> + avail[node] = mfn_to_virt(mfn + nr - 1) +
> + PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(**avail) * NR_ZONES;
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + mfn_t needed_start = _mfn(mfn + nr - needed);
> +
> + _heap[node] = vmap_contig_pages(needed_start, needed);
> + BUG_ON(!_heap[node]);
I see a BUG_ON here but init_node_heap is not __init. Asking because
BUG_ON is only a good idea during init time. Should init_node_heap be
__init (not necessarely in this patch, but still)?
> + avail[node] = (void *)(_heap[node]) + (needed << PAGE_SHIFT) -
> + sizeof(**avail) * NR_ZONES;
> + }
> + } else if ( nr >= needed &&
> (!xenheap_bits ||
> !((mfn + needed - 1) >> (xenheap_bits - PAGE_SHIFT))) )
> {
> - _heap[node] = mfn_to_virt(mfn);
> - avail[node] = mfn_to_virt(mfn + needed - 1) +
> - PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(**avail) * NR_ZONES;
> + if ( arch_mfns_in_directmap(mfn, needed) )
> + {
> + _heap[node] = mfn_to_virt(mfn);
> + avail[node] = mfn_to_virt(mfn + needed - 1) +
> + PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(**avail) * NR_ZONES;
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + mfn_t needed_start = _mfn(mfn);
> +
> + _heap[node] = vmap_contig_pages(needed_start, needed);
> + BUG_ON(!_heap[node]);
> + avail[node] = (void *)(_heap[node]) + (needed << PAGE_SHIFT) -
> + sizeof(**avail) * NR_ZONES;
> + }
> *use_tail = false;
> }
> else if ( get_order_from_bytes(sizeof(**_heap)) ==
> --
> 2.38.1
>
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |