Re: [PATCH 3/4] tools/misra: fix skipped rule numbers

[Luca Fancellu <Luca.Fancellu@xxxxxxx>]

>> 
>> Hi Stefano,
>> 
>> MISRA rules are in this format X.Y, misra_c2012_rules is a dictionary where 
>> the key is 
>> X and the value is the maximum number that Y can have.
>> 
>> For example rule 13.Y goes from 13.1 to 13.6 (in the dictionary 
>> misra_c2012_rules[13] == 6),
>> so the code can now check which among (13.1 .. 13.6) is not in the rule_list 
>> and add it to the
>> list of skipped rules.
>> 
>> Here an example:
>> {
>>    "script": "misra.py",
>>    "args": [
>>      "--rule-texts=/path/to/cppcheck-misra.txt",
>>      
>> "--suppress-rules=1.1,1.2,1.4,2.2,2.3,2.4,2.5,2.6,2.7,3.1,4.1,4.2,5.5,5.6,5.7,5.8,5.9,6.1,7.1,7.2,7.3,7.4,8.2,8.3,8.7,8.9,8.11,8.13,8.14,9.3,9.4,9.5,10.1,10.2,10.3,10.4,10.5,10.6,10.7,10.8,11.1,11.2,11.3,11.4,11.5,11.6,11.7,11.8,11.9,12.1,12.2,12.3,12.4,12.5,13.1,13.2,13.3,13.4,13.5,14.2,14.3,14.4,15.1,15.2,15.3,15.4,15.5,15.6,15.7,16.1,16.2,16.3,16.4,16.5,16.6,17.1,17.2,17.5,17.6,17.7,17.8,18.1,18.2,18.3,18.4,18.5,18.6,18.7,18.8,19.1,19.2,20.1,20.2,20.3,20.4,20.5,20.6,20.8,20.9,20.10,20.11,20.12,21.1,21.2,21.3,21.4,21.5,21.6,21.7,21.8,21.9,21.10,21.11,21.12,21.13,21.14,21.15,21.16,21.17,21.18,21.19,21.20,21.21,22.1,22.2,22.3,22.4,22.5,22.6,22.7,22.8,22.9,22.10"
>>    ]
>> }
>> 
>> So this patch is solving two issues, the first one was that rule 22.Y was 
>> never included in the suppressed
>> list because range(1,22) produces a range in [1..21], the second issue is 
>> that the code was producing
>> Invalid MISRA C 2012 rules, for example 1.21 and so on.
> 
> I see, that makes sense. Please improve the commit message with this
> information and add
> 
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thank you,

If you agree, I will change the commit message to be this one:

MISRA rules are in the format Rule X.Y, currently the script
convert_misra_doc.py is using two nested loop through range(1,22) to
enumerate rules that needs to be skipped, using combination of X.Y in
that range, however there are two issues in the code:
 - rule 22 is never included because the range(1,22) produces a range 
   in [1..21]
 - the second issue is that the code is producing invalid MISRA C 2012
   rules, for example 1.21 and so on

Fix the issue using a dictionary that list the rules in misra c2012.