[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] efi: xen: Implement memory descriptor lookup based on hypercall
On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 01:26:24PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > Xen on x86 boots dom0 in EFI mode but without providing a memory map. > This means that some sanity checks we would like to perform on > configuration tables or other data structures in memory are not > currently possible. Xen does, however, expose EFI memory descriptor info > via a Xen hypercall, so let's wire that up instead. > > Co-developed-by: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Demi Marie Obenour <demi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c | 5 ++- > drivers/xen/efi.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/efi.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c > index 55bd3f4aab28..2c12b1a06481 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c > @@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ void __init efi_find_mirror(void) > * and if so, populate the supplied memory descriptor with the appropriate > * data. > */ > -int efi_mem_desc_lookup(u64 phys_addr, efi_memory_desc_t *out_md) > +int __efi_mem_desc_lookup(u64 phys_addr, efi_memory_desc_t *out_md) > { > efi_memory_desc_t *md; > > @@ -485,6 +485,9 @@ int efi_mem_desc_lookup(u64 phys_addr, efi_memory_desc_t > *out_md) > return -ENOENT; > } > > +extern int efi_mem_desc_lookup(u64 phys_addr, efi_memory_desc_t *out_md) > + __weak __alias(__efi_mem_desc_lookup); > + > /* > * Calculate the highest address of an efi memory descriptor. > */ > diff --git a/drivers/xen/efi.c b/drivers/xen/efi.c > index d1ff2186ebb4..74f3f6d8cdc8 100644 > --- a/drivers/xen/efi.c > +++ b/drivers/xen/efi.c > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ > > #include <xen/interface/xen.h> > #include <xen/interface/platform.h> > +#include <xen/page.h> > #include <xen/xen.h> > #include <xen/xen-ops.h> > > @@ -292,3 +293,36 @@ void __init xen_efi_runtime_setup(void) > efi.get_next_high_mono_count = xen_efi_get_next_high_mono_count; > efi.reset_system = xen_efi_reset_system; > } > + > +int efi_mem_desc_lookup(u64 phys_addr, efi_memory_desc_t *out_md) > +{ > + static_assert(XEN_PAGE_SHIFT == EFI_PAGE_SHIFT, > + "Mismatch between EFI_PAGE_SHIFT and XEN_PAGE_SHIFT"); > + struct xen_platform_op op = { > + .cmd = XENPF_firmware_info, > + .u.firmware_info = { > + .type = XEN_FW_EFI_INFO, > + .index = XEN_FW_EFI_MEM_INFO, > + .u.efi_info.mem.addr = phys_addr, > + .u.efi_info.mem.size = U64_MAX - phys_addr, > + } > + }; > + union xenpf_efi_info *info = &op.u.firmware_info.u.efi_info; > + int rc; > + > + if (!efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) || efi_enabled(EFI_MEMMAP)) > + return __efi_mem_desc_lookup(phys_addr, out_md); > + > + rc = HYPERVISOR_platform_op(&op); > + if (rc) { > + pr_warn("Failed to lookup header 0x%llx in Xen memory map: > error %d\n", > + phys_addr, rc); > + } > + > + out_md->phys_addr = info->mem.addr; This will be equal to phys_addr, not the actual start of the memory region. > + out_md->num_pages = info->mem.size >> EFI_PAGE_SHIFT; Similarly, this will be the number of bytes in the memory region after phys_addr, not the total number of bytes in the region. These two differences mean that this function is not strictly equivalent to the original efi_mem_desc_lookup(). I am not sure if this matters in practice, but I thought you would want to be aware of it. -- Sincerely, Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers) Invisible Things Lab Attachment:
signature.asc
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |