[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH for-4.17] CI: Force CONFIG_XEN_IBT in the buster-gcc-ibt test
- To: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 13:25:04 +0000
- Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=citrix.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=citrix.com; dkim=pass header.d=citrix.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=oYoR9NwcASW8Pc3uqcFjQ2l8rMY6K4LBLAjMpYzHSJI=; b=YojzotGn5tiZ+FcgZ7VYr42ZY+RNeQC8eIlVCYSmQBKC4vjpWfWEfUstsyeUwVXj7oobGU+f46zFGhjMYOomMhhqdMpfKQB6lY6ETQEugkaNE+ZTO1PSis83E8AjLK5BY6ok5AqUdOmI2VliV0cwoq3zLc5zUfRh0/hhaXBcD1sVX4EDowxWdKCkXenPYyJwHt7VqAH1Rks0+JNUaEcmxDAGGbOuiLRXKu9Xp5vJqD9VY+7r5VXy9wGSKZ/iG/ul+/Zq10aJMMhoacyOkpU7rhygy4CfLTXYrKeXEKjxzHJrPV4zyTZ/ccdjPbCyBkWPHiutaZUpIdmWrfyzOFN18Q==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=HoFejPLJTtd9fT7ySkQc3Xqu8u7aWleLMa3hDlWOZaC3uwMW+TjJjuy2wpzFKE3fCMtq52b5qA68xRNQ6csNtyOxQPm+3tRoALQzVW1953iIXj9q9JKBG4yVsMrGWrQ6iNSDgezNBg84/ZW6q+f5H8k5g9eN4abSQcZmZG3HKDOrdt9msgFktmQ+1B+/C50rn5aYfBi42Zf37Ij8ywSwOd0ZUFC62RaLRUW+GYdOsVkZaOANUBRVgxJprUD53qbbxxHFDNEl26o7mWW7+Dzmy4zhMrBVE744B3nEKyJb2UkRJv8NTdTrxzcb3Yr/B6U5Vwyxp7W6wt1yfI3wnlTJ1g==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=citrix.com;
- Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Doug Goldstein <cardoe@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Henry Wang <Henry.Wang@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 13:25:20 +0000
- Ironport-data: A9a23:2z+QAqJAOq0PC/yIFE+RCZQlxSXFcZb7ZxGr2PjKsXjdYENS0zYDy 2UZXGCCOvqLZmDzct4jO4vl9xlQ75HWzdcyQFdlqX01Q3x08seUXt7xwmUcns+xwm8vaGo9s q3yv/GZdJhcokf0/0vraP65xZVF/fngbqLmD+LZMTxGSwZhSSMw4TpugOd8iYNz6TSDK1rlV eja/ouOYzdJ5xYuajhOs/PZ9ks21BjPkGhwUmIWNKgjUGD2zxH5PLpHTYmtIn3xRJVjH+LSb 44vG5ngows1Vz90Yj+Uuu6Tnn8iG9Y+DiDX4pZiYICwgwAqm8AH+v1T2Mzwy6tgo27hc9hZk L2hvHErIOsjFvWkdO81C3G0H8ziVEHvFXCuzXWX6KSuI0P6n3TEyst8KUQ2GpQk2LxyX2gUz L87dR9WR0XW7w626OrTpuhEoO0GdJWuGbxF/3ZqwHfeEOosRo3FT+PS/9hE0Twsh8dIW/HDe 84ebjkpZxPFC/FNEg5PVNRiw6H33T+mLW0wRFG9/MLb50D6ygBr3aerG93SYtGQHu1en1qCp 3KA9GP8av0fHIzHlWrfoy7w7gPJtR6mUaQPSZuAz6Epnn2eyEY9GFoVcHLu9JFVjWb7AbqzM Xc8/yM0qKEo+U+DT9/jXga5qnqJoh4dXdVLF+QwrgqKz8L88wufQ2QJUDNFQNgnr9MtAywn0 EeTmNHkDiApt6eaIVqW/62Yqj6aMiEPIWgPIyQDSGMt+ML/qYs+ihbOSNdLE6OviNDxXzbqz FiijCU4naRVsscN2I2y51WBiDWpzqUlVSYw7wTTG2e6tAVwYdb5Y5TysAaLq/FdMIyeU1+N+ mAenNST5/wPCpfLkzGRROIKH/ei4PPt3CDgvGOD1qIJr1yFk0NPt6gLiN2iDC+F6vo5RAI=
- Ironport-hdrordr: A9a23:iZAgg61/tCT2yEqLQDqKqgqjBRFyeYIsimQD101hICG9Lfb0qy n+pp4mPEHP4wr5AEtQ4uxpOMG7MBDhHQYc2/hdAV7QZnidhILOFvAv0WKC+UyrJ8SazIJgPM hbAs9D4bHLbGSSyPyKmDVQcOxQj+VvkprY49s2pk0FJW4FV0gj1XYBNu/xKDwVeOAyP+tcKH Pq3Lsjm9PPQxQqR/X+IkNAc/nIptXNmp6jSwUBHQQb5A6Hii7twKLmEjCDty1uEg9n8PMHyy zoggb57qKsv7WQ0RnHzVLe6JxQhZ/I1sZDPsqRkcIYQw+cyjpAJb4RGIFqjgpF5d1H22xa1O UkZC1QePib3kmhPF1dZyGdnTUIngxeskMKgmXo/EcL6faJOA7STfAxy76xOyGplXbJ9rtHod 129nPcuJxNARzamiPho9DOShFxj0Kx5WEviOgJkhVkIMIjgZJq3PsiFXluYeE9NTO/7JpiHP hlDcna6voTeVSGb2rBtm0qxNC3RHw8EhqPX0BH46WuonNrtWE8y1FdyN0Un38G+p54Q55Y5/ 7cOqAtkL1VVMcZYa90Ge9ES8qqDW7GRw7KLQupUBzaPbBCP2iIp4/84b0z6u3vcJsUzIEqkJ CES19cvX5aQTObNSRP5uw/zvngehTPYd228LAu23FQgMyNeJP7dSueVVspj8ys5/0CH8yzYY fABK5r
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
- Thread-index: AQHY0ahGyNiffGBomUWUhynqT69//63xscyAgAABqQA=
- Thread-topic: [PATCH for-4.17] CI: Force CONFIG_XEN_IBT in the buster-gcc-ibt test
On 26/09/2022 14:19, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 02:02:13PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> buster-gcc-ibt is a dedicated test to run a not-yet-upstreamed compiler patch
>> which is relevant to CONFIG_XEN_IBT in 4.17 and later.
>>
>> Force it on, rather than having 50% of the jobs not testing what they're
>> supposed to be testing.
> Shouldn't this job be with a static (or rather: all yes) config?
That's a separate thing needing a reversion... Currently make
allyesconfig disabled CONFIG_HVM.
But more generally, we have a pile of cases where different config
options produces differences in which and/or whether a function pointer
gets used, so a single largely-static case doesn't find any of the
interesting corner cases.
~Andrew
|
