[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH v5 3/6] xen/x86: Use ASSERT instead of VIRTUAL_BUG_ON for phys_to_nid
- To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Wei Chen <wei.chen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 17:12:15 +0800
- Arc-authentication-results: i=2; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 63.35.35.123) smtp.rcpttodomain=lists.xenproject.org smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=armh.onmicrosoft.com; arc=pass (0 oda=1 ltdi=1 spf=[1,1,smtp.mailfrom=arm.com] dmarc=[1,1,header.from=arm.com])
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 40.67.248.234) smtp.rcpttodomain=lists.xenproject.org smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=6DaMcTmBvEOAxWIqm3dcdE2xbuzXaoqO5YyicuQ8bxo=; b=lVhhatIQ1pS/vlGAiqGqjXwc0W2LuR21yV6T1VuEyAaAcOd9UKx57x7NPiwM5w2rHYe+IsC17EsZzDf0877SIFwlzj2xIHvobFZP5u3MNkaa6uqusPhG0Sw0fNYfURHzCBpg8rYynCLqRxm7ZjPaQeVSaMmE1LkCaMddOk53Sn3uUD4OHuY34TfdKA/vwb1WGA8MDVjHHSmNS2kGhOGCZmKHNcDs1UrKzSaSkg2XmJ8ChbCVPm56ZVVKcxT4/TyNCLmCFq8la8tJLPnnx0uFas3y+rrTMlgrf6u7Lj3yze3o/vDV7af3g14P8mP35eD2woUpn77cvh9oKH9/Pi5gYg==
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=6DaMcTmBvEOAxWIqm3dcdE2xbuzXaoqO5YyicuQ8bxo=; b=mcC8ZpByX19NgcnV/wUJjo/QbODtUleRpVdAvJX12RjQeO912gxB0takxSER9K3AlCuPFevdIK3anKnszsxgvHNm1aQ4gGEusyf0iwFplEB0W+9xmovxfyiBH6RGOdJfGBBmg+GPkzjNz9aT9u4x57UhQIkl/rg3uQkTbvmfHQErWCL78LVvx7WlRh4ncnF06QmDo3dACYYwP2b8R3zI825Dceqh67fHfJv+68giTDtiSuoMs9YPVBHCUoTyj0G+hEDHE0GzlCNATayzhHC2ah5NNvqjMNxcIRZs7X1hfrF1gsyaA/cQdizdaYse/ii2cGr+n/F3Qklzs8p8uWZb2A==
- Arc-seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=pass; b=BWDAU5TPAaLR9ckzUs8/2uEfcEVyzKNColu2wBP12zM5WsQ1PyeVCnG2hap671iAttrDlLnjlT8Uo2gN74M6pfpni+pn/Mg79G9xzfJkbHbGhD5tMz1C1VIbqixL7VWAHQE3pQ1/WOa3AMWdGjO4C1L43BEK+fWGlNe5pDFzkl4Gg9zrXRhHfUsWWTvV9iARSnJT3VrhSA76ueL05DvL4G2wL6dyrl128G/xuSGTOVgN3Gg64n3359X6IrQUliCnr7Z/tLZ1318ErfPUa0+b6PyV5x9MnOfWqoq3JV5NoOjus1pH8ubPSuGpBFuv6lkxVFkzvjyiyA9FiB/te0xccg==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=U+PXDO/VoelDCejfWvdYh4TLXYHsd499FQPMA5h/kJ/blJQVRgEOxw4vyzM+mSyFLc0cYKUFXwoiIKx1Yd2VTpM/Pf8LdtnAkFTSKCo2GYm2dbqswCr5nHZVi66zYLLU1ZQMnjNeBHPiHgpb4J0WGSPBCcce/O0DVUiB1J3iUM7jOmk6H26neCNGkERZHjOmLJpgRKw42ms6vqUz8vsjUqMcuQibgbCPuB6zgBacy5++SWR7VUKr6hjDmWZWxglqcuBTTPITHwal8KscV3Ds6oekcj69kFr9TN0Pe48ZDrRKAIUtwQeE4shovT6gw+uS4fCJv87vIPGwd9SaKhhJjg==
- Cc: <nd@xxxxxxx>, Wei Chen <wei.chen@xxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, "Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Jiamei Xie <jiamei.xie@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 09:16:58 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
- Nodisclaimer: true
VIRTUAL_BUG_ON is an empty macro used in phys_to_nid. This
results in two lines of error-checking code in phys_to_nid
that is not actually working and causing two compilation
errors:
1. error: "MAX_NUMNODES" undeclared (first use in this function).
This is because in the common header file, "MAX_NUMNODES" is
defined after the common header file includes the ARCH header
file, where phys_to_nid has attempted to use "MAX_NUMNODES".
This error was resolved after we moved the phys_to_nid from
x86 ARCH header file to common header file.
2. error: wrong type argument to unary exclamation mark.
This is because, the error-checking code contains !node_data[nid].
But node_data is a data structure variable, it's not a pointer.
So, in this patch, we use ASSERT instead of VIRTUAL_BUG_ON to
enable the two lines of error-checking code. And fix the left
compilation errors by replacing !node_data[nid] to
!node_data[nid].node_spanned_pages. Although NUMA allows one node
can only have CPUs but without any memory. And node with 0 bytes
of memory might have an entry in memnodemap[] theoretically. But
that doesn't mean phys_to_nid can find any valid address from a
node with 0 bytes memory.
Signed-off-by: Wei Chen <wei.chen@xxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Jiamei Xie <jiamei.xie@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
---
v4 -> v5:
1. No change.
v3 -> v4:
1. No change.
v2 -> v3:
1. Remove unnecessary change items in history.
2. Add Acked-by.
v1 -> v2:
1. Use ASSERT to replace VIRTUAL_BUG_ON in phys_to_nid.
2. Adjust the conditional express for ASSERT.
3. Refine the justification of using !node_data[nid].node_spanned_pages.
---
xen/include/xen/numa.h | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/include/xen/numa.h b/xen/include/xen/numa.h
index d799078a7a..538b283d95 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/numa.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/numa.h
@@ -36,8 +36,6 @@ struct node {
extern int compute_hash_shift(const struct node *nodes,
unsigned int numnodes, const nodeid_t *nodeids);
-#define VIRTUAL_BUG_ON(x)
-
extern bool numa_off;
extern void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
@@ -70,9 +68,9 @@ extern struct node_data node_data[];
static inline nodeid_t __attribute_pure__ phys_to_nid(paddr_t addr)
{
nodeid_t nid;
- VIRTUAL_BUG_ON((paddr_to_pdx(addr) >> memnode_shift) >= memnodemapsize);
+ ASSERT((paddr_to_pdx(addr) >> memnode_shift) < memnodemapsize);
nid = memnodemap[paddr_to_pdx(addr) >> memnode_shift];
- VIRTUAL_BUG_ON(nid >= MAX_NUMNODES || !node_data[nid]);
+ ASSERT(nid < MAX_NUMNODES && node_data[nid].node_spanned_pages);
return nid;
}
--
2.25.1
|