[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 1/2] acpi: Make TPM version configurable.
On 15.09.2022 22:40, Jennifer Herbert wrote: First of all - please follow patch submission guidelines and send patches To: the list only, with maintainers Cc:-ed. > --- a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.c > +++ b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/util.c > @@ -994,13 +994,22 @@ void hvmloader_acpi_build_tables(struct acpi_config > *config, > if ( !strncmp(xenstore_read("platform/acpi_laptop_slate", "0"), "1", 1) > ) > config->table_flags |= ACPI_HAS_SSDT_LAPTOP_SLATE; > > - config->table_flags |= (ACPI_HAS_TCPA | ACPI_HAS_IOAPIC | > + config->table_flags |= (ACPI_HAS_TPM | ACPI_HAS_IOAPIC | > ACPI_HAS_WAET | ACPI_HAS_PMTIMER | > ACPI_HAS_BUTTONS | ACPI_HAS_VGA | > ACPI_HAS_8042 | ACPI_HAS_CMOS_RTC); Did you not mean to drop ACPI_HAS_TPM here when ... > config->acpi_revision = 4; > > - config->tis_hdr = (uint16_t *)ACPI_TIS_HDR_ADDRESS; > + s = xenstore_read("platform/tpm_version", "0"); > + config->tpm_version = strtoll(s, NULL, 0); > + > + switch( config->tpm_version ) > + { > + case 1: > + config->table_flags |= ACPI_HAS_TPM; ... you now OR it in here? Or else what use is this statement? As to the use of strtoll() - I realize we have nothing else in hvmloader, but I'm still weary of the overflow potential. Just a remark, not really something to act upon. > @@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ struct acpi_config { > struct acpi_numa numa; > const struct hvm_info_table *hvminfo; > > + uint8_t tpm_version; > const uint16_t *tis_hdr; > - > /* > * Address where acpi_info should be placed. > * This must match the OperationRegion(BIOS, SystemMemory, ....) Please don't remove the blank line here. Jan
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |