[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] xen/arm: smmuv3: Move definitions to a header
- To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Rahul Singh <Rahul.Singh@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 09:11:44 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Arc-authentication-results: i=2; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 63.35.35.123) smtp.rcpttodomain=lists.xenproject.org smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=armh.onmicrosoft.com; arc=pass (0 oda=1 ltdi=1 spf=[1,1,smtp.mailfrom=arm.com] dkim=[1,1,header.d=arm.com] dmarc=[1,1,header.from=arm.com])
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass header.d=arm.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=pXHzqPrFfTspFIw1SxP0IY02oNfxltXmy++thZqLMWM=; b=ZEmMQUhrCoIh1z9Ogn44GRcQA8t01mGUxvHHY8vd3u/Nf4yzEKw/0BzaUrE1F8QLp5akkCd5HIunCauDqLw3n0/6AOhcNyYuaOtXduNeFOQo2mAcdkS3WnhFFu0lauc7gjlEiD/hgmaIo3aBFtotdwPVL3/QtvV9fiJEqnSgRdnd2ceex9ivm6SpfWeDj8u8ho4hk5nc3WFHwsfAJUymlqLzRa2WWuy3rXUf/RBnaQsv8y9Z+03EDUwQxYhpaHdQDdpDP9rT5vbeCGEfpcNUJX7bXJmhyhHQfTxYJn7xwXi/1g9/lzZ/+7+C3/Z4a+1wi0WP+Ai5ndpQuUoL1lZhLw==
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=pXHzqPrFfTspFIw1SxP0IY02oNfxltXmy++thZqLMWM=; b=Sn+sziLwLzvwOjw7KYz5ifZSvyWlu+fW4ElvIZJjCsmYNghKjiK/iLy1tx/XlfyvKeQcMXjcUyL5BwBT6Qj56we0JD6qDFHLfgW1+jZHJ1VYx/qmA5KTTR73bHFO/Ty1+XsrTfnt0z/RN0Zf3+Qpm/7bZTfuKmtr4xw85kFk7HUpABVZkm6JBrxcZJk/4PdyLE9eppmA6KJ0Sn4t8gXfcPloDy8Mufqby/z/dSjs706+4HxqGeZwhaFjcZTwTUXRaxx7/h0OUfSNRGmqmpVwQ+ePEODPkTA4MwD33tAbQPJULw3u3CTdhtpdfgTBCy0zLNZqhOgcUK6kBkuHT3bxkQ==
- Arc-seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=pass; b=NSdzgxCdDRVDM2HcEFfCNgKGNTNc0FjFF3QpsTCGjP0ePezOHADrinySP+E2qYZPPsJaReK2gQu5b8wgwGjLWlx0UzdwDXGUv88/KlyKbWmqnw7iUedm+mIBsnl8XYCUSHPr5FKlejlcvss3e7jOG8LUG27uBnBVAmLJ1wFRz77mTqpBV7FUB3kqlkHjIQ0p8jPJO9PPFrac1ewVDXHUVdEDpRJIisNMmqA45e8YtjAn19olWDFk/PR+SYNy+3Cv2KVeBccYqGHUMw8jqL3l4m5f4CNMVCbhn1r5FFDnvjapwESTlPtVv6EZrEy6K9frMC8zfB/E6FLgf8RylpUQEg==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=lFTgvocMc7g1HiLvxMUTZFIP/0yeD5TmO/J3wGPd1Z3nNELmpp8gozOctea+Kf9IaWi4i1QqLbV+9im1uUM57aaiWPvZ1kjeE3QOaJanyUv25SjnHk1uV7Tkz7rNocPgbXBvEBU4GILqBUm2eMw1mWedXCq0FzEHeQtuaakrIbGt6XRFdwRtvvuR1unQ2Q+9jpO3LlKtmwIhZRtAOfFHtSswYvzzqESCa+U56VmA/2Zg0Adx2NrIXcyQ2dZfU4xhWFlij4j1fyqjfl+pfpkOLPRyX0AHoLMEbrFtBsxBcQsjX8k43s3t+DpW9sRGaB+0j5IichRajOc/vjhrC+YgUw==
- Authentication-results-original: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
- Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@xxxxxxx>, Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>, Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@xxxxxxxxxx>, Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 09:12:02 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
- Nodisclaimer: true
- Original-authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
- Thread-index: AQHYvtETH3/THBwEyUiOSo1yfqj9qq3Myi8AgAPHNoA=
- Thread-topic: [PATCH v2 04/10] xen/arm: smmuv3: Move definitions to a header
Hi Stefano,
> On 3 Sep 2022, at 12:29 am, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2 Sep 2022, Rahul Singh wrote:
>> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Backport Linux commit e881e7839fba. This is the clean backport without
>> any changes.
>
> I don't think we can say that this is a clean backport because there are
> differences between the two patches.
>
> That said, it is just code movement, it is similar to the original
> patch, and it still compiles. So I think we should change the commit
> message not to say that it is a clean backport, but other than that is
> fine.
>
Ok. I will remove the clean backport msg from commit msg in next version.
Regards,
Rahul
|
