|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH V4 3/6] libxl: arm: Create alloc_virtio_mmio_params()
On 09.08.22 08:34, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Hello Viresh
> Create a separate routine to allocate base and irq for a device as the
> same code will be required for each device type.
>
> Suggested-by: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c b/tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c
> index 1a3ac1646e94..4a750852b671 100644
> --- a/tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c
> +++ b/tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,24 @@ static uint32_t alloc_virtio_mmio_irq(libxl__gc *gc,
> uint32_t *virtio_mmio_irq)
> return irq;
> }
>
> +static int alloc_virtio_mmio_params(libxl__gc *gc, uint64_t *base,
> + uint32_t *irq, uint64_t
> *virtio_mmio_base,
> + uint32_t *virtio_mmio_irq)
> +{
> + *base = alloc_virtio_mmio_base(gc, virtio_mmio_base);
> + if (!*base)
> + return ERROR_FAIL;
> +
> + *irq = alloc_virtio_mmio_irq(gc, virtio_mmio_irq);
> + if (!*irq)
> + return ERROR_FAIL;
> +
> + LOG(DEBUG, "Allocate Virtio MMIO params: IRQ %u BASE 0x%"PRIx64, *irq,
> + *base);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const char *gicv_to_string(libxl_gic_version gic_version)
> {
> switch (gic_version) {
> @@ -85,20 +103,10 @@ int libxl__arch_domain_prepare_config(libxl__gc *gc,
> libxl_device_disk *disk = &d_config->disks[i];
>
> if (disk->specification == LIBXL_DISK_SPECIFICATION_VIRTIO) {
> - disk->base = alloc_virtio_mmio_base(gc, &virtio_mmio_base);
> - if (!disk->base)
> - return ERROR_FAIL;
> -
> - disk->irq = alloc_virtio_mmio_irq(gc, &virtio_mmio_irq);
> - if (!disk->irq)
> - return ERROR_FAIL;
> -
> - if (virtio_irq < disk->irq)
> - virtio_irq = disk->irq;
> - virtio_enabled = true;
> -
> - LOG(DEBUG, "Allocate Virtio MMIO params for Vdev %s: IRQ %u BASE
> 0x%"PRIx64,
> - disk->vdev, disk->irq, disk->base);
> + int rc = alloc_virtio_mmio_params(gc, &disk->base, &disk->irq,
> + &virtio_mmio_base, &virtio_mmio_irq);
Nit: Something wrong with the indentation and looks like the blank line
is needed here.
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -107,8 +115,11 @@ int libxl__arch_domain_prepare_config(libxl__gc *gc,
> * present, make sure that we allocate enough SPIs for them.
> * The resulting "nr_spis" needs to cover the highest possible SPI.
> */
> - if (virtio_enabled)
> + if (virtio_mmio_irq != GUEST_VIRTIO_MMIO_SPI_FIRST) {
> + virtio_enabled = true;
> + virtio_irq = virtio_mmio_irq - 1;
Well, here we assume that "virtio_mmio_irq" is always the highest
allocated irq, currently it is true because we increment the counter in
alloc_virtio_mmio_irq(),
but this logic might be changed in future. So I would probably add a
comment in code about that assumption.
> nr_spis = max(nr_spis, virtio_irq - 32 + 1);
> + }
>
> for (i = 0; i < d_config->b_info.num_irqs; i++) {
> uint32_t irq = d_config->b_info.irqs[i];
With above fixed:
Reviewed-by: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@xxxxxxxx>
--
Regards,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |