[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH V3 3/6] libxl: arm: Create alloc_virtio_mmio_params()
- To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- From: Oleksandr <olekstysh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 21:39:00 +0300
- Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx>, stratos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mike Holmes <mike.holmes@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@xxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Mon, 08 Aug 2022 18:39:07 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 04.08.22 10:01, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Hello Viresh
Create a separate routine to allocate base and irq for a device as the
same code will be required for each device type.
Suggested-by: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c b/tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c
index 1a3ac1646e94..2f64b9f0ebee 100644
--- a/tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c
+++ b/tools/libs/light/libxl_arm.c
@@ -48,6 +48,24 @@ static uint32_t alloc_virtio_mmio_irq(libxl__gc *gc,
uint32_t *virtio_mmio_irq)
return irq;
}
+static int alloc_virtio_mmio_params(libxl__gc *gc, uint64_t *base,
+ uint32_t *irq, uint64_t *virtio_mmio_base,
+ uint32_t *virtio_mmio_irq)
+{
+ *base = alloc_virtio_mmio_base(gc, virtio_mmio_base);
+ if (!*base)
+ return ERROR_FAIL;
+
+ *irq = alloc_virtio_mmio_irq(gc, virtio_mmio_irq);
+ if (!*irq)
+ return ERROR_FAIL;
+
+ LOG(DEBUG, "Allocate Virtio MMIO params: IRQ %u BASE 0x%"PRIx64, *irq,
+ *base);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static const char *gicv_to_string(libxl_gic_version gic_version)
{
switch (gic_version) {
@@ -85,20 +103,12 @@ int libxl__arch_domain_prepare_config(libxl__gc *gc,
libxl_device_disk *disk = &d_config->disks[i];
if (disk->specification == LIBXL_DISK_SPECIFICATION_VIRTIO) {
- disk->base = alloc_virtio_mmio_base(gc, &virtio_mmio_base);
- if (!disk->base)
- return ERROR_FAIL;
+ int rc = alloc_virtio_mmio_params(gc, &disk->base, &disk->irq,
+ &virtio_mmio_base, &virtio_mmio_irq);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
- disk->irq = alloc_virtio_mmio_irq(gc, &virtio_mmio_irq);
- if (!disk->irq)
- return ERROR_FAIL;
-
- if (virtio_irq < disk->irq)
- virtio_irq = disk->irq;
virtio_enabled = true;
I think that "virtio_enabled = true;" should be moved ...
-
- LOG(DEBUG, "Allocate Virtio MMIO params for Vdev %s: IRQ %u BASE
0x%"PRIx64,
- disk->vdev, disk->irq, disk->base);
}
}
@@ -107,8 +117,10 @@ int libxl__arch_domain_prepare_config(libxl__gc *gc,
* present, make sure that we allocate enough SPIs for them.
* The resulting "nr_spis" needs to cover the highest possible SPI.
*/
- if (virtio_enabled)
+ if (virtio_mmio_irq != GUEST_VIRTIO_MMIO_SPI_FIRST) {
+ virtio_irq = virtio_mmio_irq - 1;
nr_spis = max(nr_spis, virtio_irq - 32 + 1);
... here. Otherwise after applying all patches "virtio_enabled" only
gets set if there is a virtio disk device. So it won't be set for virtio
i2c, etc.
I see that in V2 it was there, but in V3 is not. Or maybe there is some
reason for doing that which I am not aware of?
Other changes look good.
+ }
for (i = 0; i < d_config->b_info.num_irqs; i++) {
uint32_t irq = d_config->b_info.irqs[i];
--
Regards,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko
|