[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] console: support multiple serial console simultaneously
On 26.07.2022 05:23, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > --- a/xen/drivers/char/Kconfig > +++ b/xen/drivers/char/Kconfig > @@ -85,6 +85,17 @@ config SERIAL_TX_BUFSIZE > > Default value is 16384 (16kiB). > > +config MAX_SERCONS > + int "Maximum number of serial consoles active at once" > + default 4 > + help > + Controls how many serial consoles can be active at once. Configuring > more > + using `console=` parameter will be ignored. > + When multiple consoles are configured, overhead of `sync_console` > option > + is even bigger. > + > + Default value is 4. Indentation (the help text ought to be indented by a tab and two spaces). > --- a/xen/drivers/char/console.c > +++ b/xen/drivers/char/console.c > @@ -113,7 +113,9 @@ static char *__read_mostly conring = _conring; > static uint32_t __read_mostly conring_size = _CONRING_SIZE; > static uint32_t conringc, conringp; > > -static int __read_mostly sercon_handle = -1; > +#define MAX_SERCONS CONFIG_MAX_SERCONS > +static int __read_mostly sercon_handle[MAX_SERCONS]; > +static int __read_mostly nr_sercon_handle = 0; unsigned int please. > @@ -393,32 +395,59 @@ long read_console_ring(struct xen_sysctl_readconsole > *op) > static char serial_rx_ring[SERIAL_RX_SIZE]; > static unsigned int serial_rx_cons, serial_rx_prod; > > -static void (*serial_steal_fn)(const char *, size_t nr) = early_puts; > +/* The last entry means "steal from all consoles" */ > +static void (*serial_steal_fn[MAX_SERCONS+1])(const char *, size_t nr) = { Nit: blanks please around + . But with ... > + [MAX_SERCONS] = early_puts, ... this initializer you could as well omit the dimension. > +}; > > +/* > + * Redirect console *handle* output to *fn*. Use SERHND_STEAL_ALL as > *handle* to > + * redirect all the consoles. > + */ > int console_steal(int handle, void (*fn)(const char *, size_t nr)) > { > - if ( (handle == -1) || (handle != sercon_handle) ) > - return 0; > + int i; While from the use inside the function this would better be unsigned int, I can see how that would be slightly odd with the return value. But with overly high a MAX_SERCONS ... > + if ( handle == -1 ) > + return -ENOENT; > + if ( serial_steal_fn[MAX_SERCONS] != NULL ) > + return -EBUSY; > + if ( handle == SERHND_STEAL_ALL ) > + { > + serial_steal_fn[MAX_SERCONS] = fn; > + return MAX_SERCONS; > + } > + for ( i = 0; i < nr_sercon_handle; i++ ) > + if ( handle == sercon_handle[i] ) ... the array access will degenerate when i is "int", but will be okay when i is "unsigned int" (and of course everything will break if MAX_SERCONS > UINT_MAX). > + break; > + if ( i == nr_sercon_handle ) > + return -ENOENT; > > - if ( serial_steal_fn != NULL ) > + if ( serial_steal_fn[i] != NULL ) > return -EBUSY; > > - serial_steal_fn = fn; > - return 1; > + serial_steal_fn[i] = fn; > + return i; > } > > void console_giveback(int id) > { > - if ( id == 1 ) > - serial_steal_fn = NULL; > + if ( id >= 0 && id <= MAX_SERCONS ) > + serial_steal_fn[id] = NULL; > } > > void console_serial_puts(const char *s, size_t nr) > { > - if ( serial_steal_fn != NULL ) > - serial_steal_fn(s, nr); > + int i; unsigned int please, again (yet more further down). > + if ( serial_steal_fn[MAX_SERCONS] != NULL ) > + serial_steal_fn[MAX_SERCONS](s, nr); > else > - serial_puts(sercon_handle, s, nr); > + for ( i = 0; i < nr_sercon_handle; i++ ) > + if ( serial_steal_fn[i] != NULL ) > + serial_steal_fn[i](s, nr); > + else > + serial_puts(sercon_handle[i], s, nr); This for() would better gain braces. > @@ -977,8 +1006,12 @@ void __init console_init_preirq(void) > continue; > else if ( (sh = serial_parse_handle(p)) >= 0 ) > { > - sercon_handle = sh; > - serial_steal_fn = NULL; > + if ( nr_sercon_handle < MAX_SERCONS ) > + sercon_handle[nr_sercon_handle++] = sh; > + else > + printk("Too many consoles (max %d), ignoring '%s'\n", > + MAX_SERCONS, p); In order to use p here, I think we want (need?) to make serial_parse_handle()'s parameter const char *. > --- a/xen/drivers/char/xhci-dbc.c > +++ b/xen/drivers/char/xhci-dbc.c > @@ -1078,8 +1078,12 @@ void __init xhci_dbc_uart_init(void) > > e = parse_pci(opt_dbgp + 8, NULL, &bus, &slot, &func); > if ( !e || *e ) > + { > + printk(XENLOG_ERR > + "Invalid dbgp= PCI device spec: '%s'\n", > + opt_dbgp); > return; > - > + } > dbc->sbdf = PCI_SBDF(0, bus, slot, func); > } Does this change belong elsewhere? Jan
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |