[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 14/36] cpuidle: Fix rcu_idle_*() usage
 
- To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 
- From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
 
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 13:41:13 +0100
 
- Cc: rth@xxxxxxxxxxx, ink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mattst88@xxxxxxxxx,	vgupta@xxxxxxxxxx, linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ulli.kroll@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx, shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx,	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	festevam@xxxxxxxxx, linux-imx@xxxxxxx, tony@xxxxxxxxxxx,	khilman@xxxxxxxxxx, catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx, will@xxxxxxxxxx,	guoren@xxxxxxxxxx, bcain@xxxxxxxxxxx, chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxx,	kernel@xxxxxxxxxx, geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sammy@xxxxxxxxx,	monstr@xxxxxxxxx, tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dinguyen@xxxxxxxxxx,	jonas@xxxxxxxxxxxx, stefan.kristiansson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,	shorne@xxxxxxxxx, James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	deller@xxxxxx, mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	paulus@xxxxxxxxx, paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx, palmer@xxxxxxxxxxx,	aou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,	agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,	svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dalias@xxxxxxxx,	davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, richard@xxxxxx,	anton.ivanov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxxxx,	dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx,	acme@xxxxxxxxxx, alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx, namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx, jgross@xxxxxxxx,	srivatsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, amakhalov@xxxxxxxxxx, pv-drivers@xxxxxxxxxx,	boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx, chris@xxxxxxxxxx, jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx,	rafael@xxxxxxxxxx, lenb@xxxxxxxxxx, pavel@xxxxxx,	gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx,	sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx, daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx, lpieralisi@xxxxxxxxxx,	sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx, agross@xxxxxxxxxx, bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx,	anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx, jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx,	jacob.jun.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>,	yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx, andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx, pmladek@xxxxxxxx,	senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx, john.ogness@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,	paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx, frederic@xxxxxxxxxx, quic_neeraju@xxxxxxxxxxx,	josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx,	jiangshanlai@xxxxxxxxx, joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx, vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx,	dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx, bsegall@xxxxxxxxxx, mgorman@xxxxxxx,	bristot@xxxxxxxxxx, vschneid@xxxxxxxxxx, jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx,	linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-snps-arc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-csky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-hexagon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, openrisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-parisc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-um@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-perf-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	rcu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 
- Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 12:42:28 +0000
 
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
 
 
 
On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 04:27:37PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> @@ -622,9 +622,13 @@ struct cpumask *tick_get_broadcast_onesh
>   * to avoid a deep idle transition as we are about to get the
>   * broadcast IPI right away.
>   */
> -int tick_check_broadcast_expired(void)
> +noinstr int tick_check_broadcast_expired(void)
>  {
> +#ifdef _ASM_GENERIC_BITOPS_INSTRUMENTED_NON_ATOMIC_H
> +     return arch_test_bit(smp_processor_id(), 
> cpumask_bits(tick_broadcast_force_mask));
> +#else
>       return cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), tick_broadcast_force_mask);
> +#endif
>  }
This is somewhat not-ideal. :/
Could we unconditionally do the arch_test_bit() variant, with a comment, or
does that not exist in some cases?
Thanks,
Mark.
 
    
     |